[2/3] media: staging: atomisp: Fix an error handling path in 'lm3554_probe()'

  The use of 'fail1' and 'fail2' is not correct. Reorder these calls to
branch at the right place of the error handling path.

Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>
---
 drivers/staging/media/atomisp/i2c/atomisp-lm3554.c | 5 ++---
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
  

On Fri, 11 May 2018, Christophe JAILLET wrote:

> The use of 'fail1' and 'fail2' is not correct. Reorder these calls to
> branch at the right place of the error handling path.

Maybe it would be good to improve the names at the same time?

julia

>
> Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>
> ---
>  drivers/staging/media/atomisp/i2c/atomisp-lm3554.c | 5 ++---
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/i2c/atomisp-lm3554.c b/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/i2c/atomisp-lm3554.c
> index 723fa74ff815..1e5f516f6e50 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/i2c/atomisp-lm3554.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/i2c/atomisp-lm3554.c
> @@ -871,7 +871,7 @@ static int lm3554_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
>  				     ARRAY_SIZE(lm3554_controls));
>  	if (err) {
>  		dev_err(&client->dev, "error initialize a ctrl_handler.\n");
> -		goto fail2;
> +		goto fail1;
>  	}
>
>  	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(lm3554_controls); i++)
> @@ -879,7 +879,6 @@ static int lm3554_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
>  				     NULL);
>
>  	if (flash->ctrl_handler.error) {
> -
>  		dev_err(&client->dev, "ctrl_handler error.\n");
>  		goto fail2;
>  	}
> @@ -888,7 +887,7 @@ static int lm3554_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
>  	err = media_entity_pads_init(&flash->sd.entity, 0, NULL);
>  	if (err) {
>  		dev_err(&client->dev, "error initialize a media entity.\n");
> -		goto fail1;
> +		goto fail2;
>  	}
>
>  	flash->sd.entity.function = MEDIA_ENT_F_FLASH;
> --
> 2.17.0
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
  

On Fri, 2018-05-11 at 17:09 +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
> 
> On Fri, 11 May 2018, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
> 
> > The use of 'fail1' and 'fail2' is not correct. Reorder these calls
> > to
> > branch at the right place of the error handling path.
> 
> Maybe it would be good to improve the names at the same time?

Its scheduled for deletion - please don't bother.

Alan