[RFC] gspca pac7302: add USB PID range based on heuristics

Message ID 4B655949.50102@freemail.hu (mailing list archive)
State RFC, archived
Headers

Commit Message

Németh Márton Jan. 31, 2010, 10:19 a.m. UTC
  Hi,

as I was reading the PixArt PAC7301/PAC7302 datasheet
( http://www.pixart.com.tw/upload/PAC7301_7302%20%20Spec%20V1_20091228174030.pdf )
I recognised a little description on the schematics. This is about how to
set up the USB Product ID from range 0x2620..0x262f via hardware wires.

I had the idea that the list of supported devices could be extended with the full
range because the System on a Chip internals will not change just because it is
configured to a different USB Product ID.

I don't know much about the maintenance implications that's why I'm very
much listening to the comments of this idea.

So, what do you think?

Regards,

	Márton Németh

---
From: Márton Németh <nm127@freemail.hu>

On the schematics in PixArt PAC7301/PAC7302 datasheet
(http://www.pixart.com.tw/upload/PAC7301_7302%20%20Spec%20V1_20091228174030.pdf)
pages 19, 20, 21 and 22 there is a note titled "PID IO_TRAP" which describes
the possible product ID range 0x2620..0x262f. In this range there are some
known webcams, however, there are some PIDs with unknown or future devices.
Because PixArt PAC7301/PAC7302 is a System on a Chip (SoC) device is is
probable that this driver will work correctly independent of the used PID.

Signed-off-by: Márton Németh <nm127@freemail.hu>
---
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
  

Comments

Hans de Goede Jan. 31, 2010, 12:21 p.m. UTC | #1
Hi,

On 01/31/2010 11:19 AM, Németh Márton wrote:
> Hi,
>
> as I was reading the PixArt PAC7301/PAC7302 datasheet
> ( http://www.pixart.com.tw/upload/PAC7301_7302%20%20Spec%20V1_20091228174030.pdf )
> I recognised a little description on the schematics. This is about how to
> set up the USB Product ID from range 0x2620..0x262f via hardware wires.
>
> I had the idea that the list of supported devices could be extended with the full
> range because the System on a Chip internals will not change just because it is
> configured to a different USB Product ID.
>
> I don't know much about the maintenance implications that's why I'm very
> much listening to the comments of this idea.
>
> So, what do you think?
>

Seems like a good idea to me.

Regards,

Hans

> Regards,
>
> 	Márton Németh
>
> ---
> From: Márton Németh<nm127@freemail.hu>
>
> On the schematics in PixArt PAC7301/PAC7302 datasheet
> (http://www.pixart.com.tw/upload/PAC7301_7302%20%20Spec%20V1_20091228174030.pdf)
> pages 19, 20, 21 and 22 there is a note titled "PID IO_TRAP" which describes
> the possible product ID range 0x2620..0x262f. In this range there are some
> known webcams, however, there are some PIDs with unknown or future devices.
> Because PixArt PAC7301/PAC7302 is a System on a Chip (SoC) device is is
> probable that this driver will work correctly independent of the used PID.
>
> Signed-off-by: Márton Németh<nm127@freemail.hu>
> ---
> diff -r dfa82cf98a85 linux/drivers/media/video/gspca/pac7302.c
> --- a/linux/drivers/media/video/gspca/pac7302.c	Sat Jan 30 20:03:02 2010 +0100
> +++ b/linux/drivers/media/video/gspca/pac7302.c	Sun Jan 31 11:08:21 2010 +0100
> @@ -96,6 +96,7 @@
>   	u8 flags;
>   #define FL_HFLIP 0x01		/* mirrored by default */
>   #define FL_VFLIP 0x02		/* vertical flipped by default */
> +#define FL_EXPERIMENTAL 0x80	/* USB IDs based on heuristic without any known product */
>
>   	u8 sof_read;
>   	u8 autogain_ignore_frames;
> @@ -1220,17 +1221,33 @@
>   };
>
>   /* -- module initialisation -- */
> +/* Note on FL_EXPERIMENTAL:
> + * On the schematics in PixArt PAC7301/PAC7302 datasheet
> + * (http://www.pixart.com.tw/upload/PAC7301_7302%20%20Spec%20V1_20091228174030.pdf)
> + * pages 19, 20, 21 and 22 there is a note titled "PID IO_TRAP" which describes
> + * the possible product ID range 0x2620..0x262f. In this range there are some
> + * known webcams, however, there are some PIDs with unknown or future devices.
> + * Because PixArt PAC7301/PAC7302 is a System on a Chip (SoC) device is is
> + * probable that this driver will work correctly independent of the used PID.
> + */
>   static const struct usb_device_id device_table[] __devinitconst = {
>   	{USB_DEVICE(0x06f8, 0x3009)},
>   	{USB_DEVICE(0x093a, 0x2620)},
>   	{USB_DEVICE(0x093a, 0x2621)},
>   	{USB_DEVICE(0x093a, 0x2622), .driver_info = FL_VFLIP},
> +	{USB_DEVICE(0x093a, 0x2623), .driver_info = FL_EXPERIMENTAL },
>   	{USB_DEVICE(0x093a, 0x2624), .driver_info = FL_VFLIP},
> +	{USB_DEVICE(0x093a, 0x2625), .driver_info = FL_EXPERIMENTAL },
>   	{USB_DEVICE(0x093a, 0x2626)},
> +	{USB_DEVICE(0x093a, 0x2627), .driver_info = FL_EXPERIMENTAL },
>   	{USB_DEVICE(0x093a, 0x2628)},
>   	{USB_DEVICE(0x093a, 0x2629), .driver_info = FL_VFLIP},
>   	{USB_DEVICE(0x093a, 0x262a)},
> +	{USB_DEVICE(0x093a, 0x262b), .driver_info = FL_EXPERIMENTAL },
>   	{USB_DEVICE(0x093a, 0x262c)},
> +	{USB_DEVICE(0x093a, 0x262d), .driver_info = FL_EXPERIMENTAL },
> +	{USB_DEVICE(0x093a, 0x262e), .driver_info = FL_EXPERIMENTAL },
> +	{USB_DEVICE(0x093a, 0x262f), .driver_info = FL_EXPERIMENTAL },
>   	{}
>   };
>   MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(usb, device_table);
> @@ -1239,6 +1256,17 @@
>   static int __devinit sd_probe(struct usb_interface *intf,
>   			const struct usb_device_id *id)
>   {
> +	if ((u8)id->driver_info&  FL_EXPERIMENTAL) {
> +		PDEBUG(D_ERR | D_PROBE, "WARNING: USB device ID %04x:%04x is "
> +			"not known, but based on some heuristics this driver "
> +			"tries to handle it.",
> +			id->idVendor, id->idProduct);
> +		PDEBUG(D_ERR | D_PROBE, "WARNING: Plase send an email to "
> +			"linux-media@vger.kernel.org with 'lsusb -v' output, "
> +			"the vendor and name of the product and whether the "
> +			"device is working or not.");
> +	}
> +
>   	return gspca_dev_probe(intf, id,&sd_desc, sizeof(struct sd),
>   				THIS_MODULE);
>   }
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
  

Patch

diff -r dfa82cf98a85 linux/drivers/media/video/gspca/pac7302.c
--- a/linux/drivers/media/video/gspca/pac7302.c	Sat Jan 30 20:03:02 2010 +0100
+++ b/linux/drivers/media/video/gspca/pac7302.c	Sun Jan 31 11:08:21 2010 +0100
@@ -96,6 +96,7 @@ 
 	u8 flags;
 #define FL_HFLIP 0x01		/* mirrored by default */
 #define FL_VFLIP 0x02		/* vertical flipped by default */
+#define FL_EXPERIMENTAL 0x80	/* USB IDs based on heuristic without any known product */

 	u8 sof_read;
 	u8 autogain_ignore_frames;
@@ -1220,17 +1221,33 @@ 
 };

 /* -- module initialisation -- */
+/* Note on FL_EXPERIMENTAL:
+ * On the schematics in PixArt PAC7301/PAC7302 datasheet
+ * (http://www.pixart.com.tw/upload/PAC7301_7302%20%20Spec%20V1_20091228174030.pdf)
+ * pages 19, 20, 21 and 22 there is a note titled "PID IO_TRAP" which describes
+ * the possible product ID range 0x2620..0x262f. In this range there are some
+ * known webcams, however, there are some PIDs with unknown or future devices.
+ * Because PixArt PAC7301/PAC7302 is a System on a Chip (SoC) device is is
+ * probable that this driver will work correctly independent of the used PID.
+ */
 static const struct usb_device_id device_table[] __devinitconst = {
 	{USB_DEVICE(0x06f8, 0x3009)},
 	{USB_DEVICE(0x093a, 0x2620)},
 	{USB_DEVICE(0x093a, 0x2621)},
 	{USB_DEVICE(0x093a, 0x2622), .driver_info = FL_VFLIP},
+	{USB_DEVICE(0x093a, 0x2623), .driver_info = FL_EXPERIMENTAL },
 	{USB_DEVICE(0x093a, 0x2624), .driver_info = FL_VFLIP},
+	{USB_DEVICE(0x093a, 0x2625), .driver_info = FL_EXPERIMENTAL },
 	{USB_DEVICE(0x093a, 0x2626)},
+	{USB_DEVICE(0x093a, 0x2627), .driver_info = FL_EXPERIMENTAL },
 	{USB_DEVICE(0x093a, 0x2628)},
 	{USB_DEVICE(0x093a, 0x2629), .driver_info = FL_VFLIP},
 	{USB_DEVICE(0x093a, 0x262a)},
+	{USB_DEVICE(0x093a, 0x262b), .driver_info = FL_EXPERIMENTAL },
 	{USB_DEVICE(0x093a, 0x262c)},
+	{USB_DEVICE(0x093a, 0x262d), .driver_info = FL_EXPERIMENTAL },
+	{USB_DEVICE(0x093a, 0x262e), .driver_info = FL_EXPERIMENTAL },
+	{USB_DEVICE(0x093a, 0x262f), .driver_info = FL_EXPERIMENTAL },
 	{}
 };
 MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(usb, device_table);
@@ -1239,6 +1256,17 @@ 
 static int __devinit sd_probe(struct usb_interface *intf,
 			const struct usb_device_id *id)
 {
+	if ((u8)id->driver_info & FL_EXPERIMENTAL) {
+		PDEBUG(D_ERR | D_PROBE, "WARNING: USB device ID %04x:%04x is "
+			"not known, but based on some heuristics this driver "
+			"tries to handle it.",
+			id->idVendor, id->idProduct);
+		PDEBUG(D_ERR | D_PROBE, "WARNING: Plase send an email to "
+			"linux-media@vger.kernel.org with 'lsusb -v' output, "
+			"the vendor and name of the product and whether the "
+			"device is working or not.");
+	}
+
 	return gspca_dev_probe(intf, id, &sd_desc, sizeof(struct sd),
 				THIS_MODULE);
 }