[v3,7/9] media: subdev: Support privacy led in v4l2_subdev_enable/disable_streams()

Message ID 20240410-enable-streams-impro-v3-7-e5e7a5da7420@ideasonboard.com (mailing list archive)
State Superseded
Headers
Series media: subdev: Improve stream enable/disable machinery |

Commit Message

Tomi Valkeinen April 10, 2024, 12:35 p.m. UTC
  We support camera privacy leds with the .s_stream, in call_s_stream, but
we don't have that support when the subdevice implements
.enable/disable_streams.

Add the support by enabling the led when the first stream for a
subdevice is enabled, and disabling the led then the last stream is
disabled.

Signed-off-by: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ideasonboard.com>
---
 drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-subdev.c | 9 +++++++++
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
  

Comments

Umang Jain April 11, 2024, 4:58 a.m. UTC | #1
Hi Tomi,

Thank you for the patch.

On 10/04/24 6:05 pm, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
> We support camera privacy leds with the .s_stream, in call_s_stream, but
> we don't have that support when the subdevice implements
> .enable/disable_streams.
>
> Add the support by enabling the led when the first stream for a
> subdevice is enabled, and disabling the led then the last stream is
> disabled.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ideasonboard.com>

Reviewed-by: Umang Jain <umang.jain@ideasonboard.com>

> ---
>   drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-subdev.c | 9 +++++++++
>   1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-subdev.c b/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-subdev.c
> index 20b5a00cbeeb..f44aaa4e1fab 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-subdev.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-subdev.c
> @@ -2150,6 +2150,7 @@ int v4l2_subdev_enable_streams(struct v4l2_subdev *sd, u32 pad,
>   {
>   	struct device *dev = sd->entity.graph_obj.mdev->dev;
>   	struct v4l2_subdev_state *state;
> +	bool already_streaming;
>   	u64 found_streams = 0;
>   	unsigned int i;
>   	int ret;
> @@ -2198,6 +2199,8 @@ int v4l2_subdev_enable_streams(struct v4l2_subdev *sd, u32 pad,
>   
>   	dev_dbg(dev, "enable streams %u:%#llx\n", pad, streams_mask);
>   
> +	already_streaming = v4l2_subdev_is_streaming(sd);
> +
>   	/* Call the .enable_streams() operation. */
>   	ret = v4l2_subdev_call(sd, pad, enable_streams, state, pad,
>   			       streams_mask);
> @@ -2216,6 +2219,9 @@ int v4l2_subdev_enable_streams(struct v4l2_subdev *sd, u32 pad,
>   			cfg->enabled = true;
>   	}
>   
> +	if (!already_streaming)
> +		v4l2_subdev_enable_privacy_led(sd);
> +
>   done:
>   	v4l2_subdev_unlock_state(state);
>   
> @@ -2340,6 +2346,9 @@ int v4l2_subdev_disable_streams(struct v4l2_subdev *sd, u32 pad,
>   	}
>   
>   done:
> +	if (!v4l2_subdev_is_streaming(sd))
> +		v4l2_subdev_disable_privacy_led(sd);
> +
>   	v4l2_subdev_unlock_state(state);
>   
>   	return ret;
>
  
Laurent Pinchart April 12, 2024, 6:20 p.m. UTC | #2
Hi Tomi,

Thank you for the patch.

On Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 03:35:54PM +0300, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
> We support camera privacy leds with the .s_stream, in call_s_stream, but

s/the .s_stream/the .s_stream() operation/

> we don't have that support when the subdevice implements
> .enable/disable_streams.
> 
> Add the support by enabling the led when the first stream for a
> subdevice is enabled, and disabling the led then the last stream is
> disabled.

I wonder if that will always be the correct constraint for all devices,
but I suppose we can worry about it later.

> Signed-off-by: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ideasonboard.com>
> ---
>  drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-subdev.c | 9 +++++++++
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-subdev.c b/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-subdev.c
> index 20b5a00cbeeb..f44aaa4e1fab 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-subdev.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-subdev.c
> @@ -2150,6 +2150,7 @@ int v4l2_subdev_enable_streams(struct v4l2_subdev *sd, u32 pad,
>  {
>  	struct device *dev = sd->entity.graph_obj.mdev->dev;
>  	struct v4l2_subdev_state *state;
> +	bool already_streaming;
>  	u64 found_streams = 0;
>  	unsigned int i;
>  	int ret;
> @@ -2198,6 +2199,8 @@ int v4l2_subdev_enable_streams(struct v4l2_subdev *sd, u32 pad,
>  
>  	dev_dbg(dev, "enable streams %u:%#llx\n", pad, streams_mask);
>  
> +	already_streaming = v4l2_subdev_is_streaming(sd);
> +
>  	/* Call the .enable_streams() operation. */
>  	ret = v4l2_subdev_call(sd, pad, enable_streams, state, pad,
>  			       streams_mask);
> @@ -2216,6 +2219,9 @@ int v4l2_subdev_enable_streams(struct v4l2_subdev *sd, u32 pad,
>  			cfg->enabled = true;
>  	}
>  
> +	if (!already_streaming)
> +		v4l2_subdev_enable_privacy_led(sd);
> +
>  done:
>  	v4l2_subdev_unlock_state(state);
>  
> @@ -2340,6 +2346,9 @@ int v4l2_subdev_disable_streams(struct v4l2_subdev *sd, u32 pad,
>  	}
>  
>  done:
> +	if (!v4l2_subdev_is_streaming(sd))

Wouldn't it be more efficient to check this while looping over the
stream configs in the loop just above ? Same for
v4l2_subdev_enable_streams().

> +		v4l2_subdev_disable_privacy_led(sd);
> +
>  	v4l2_subdev_unlock_state(state);
>  
>  	return ret;
>
  
Tomi Valkeinen April 16, 2024, 10:34 a.m. UTC | #3
On 12/04/2024 21:20, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Tomi,
> 
> Thank you for the patch.
> 
> On Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 03:35:54PM +0300, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
>> We support camera privacy leds with the .s_stream, in call_s_stream, but
> 
> s/the .s_stream/the .s_stream() operation/
> 
>> we don't have that support when the subdevice implements
>> .enable/disable_streams.
>>
>> Add the support by enabling the led when the first stream for a
>> subdevice is enabled, and disabling the led then the last stream is
>> disabled.
> 
> I wonder if that will always be the correct constraint for all devices,
> but I suppose we can worry about it later.
> 
>> Signed-off-by: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ideasonboard.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-subdev.c | 9 +++++++++
>>   1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-subdev.c b/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-subdev.c
>> index 20b5a00cbeeb..f44aaa4e1fab 100644
>> --- a/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-subdev.c
>> +++ b/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-subdev.c
>> @@ -2150,6 +2150,7 @@ int v4l2_subdev_enable_streams(struct v4l2_subdev *sd, u32 pad,
>>   {
>>   	struct device *dev = sd->entity.graph_obj.mdev->dev;
>>   	struct v4l2_subdev_state *state;
>> +	bool already_streaming;
>>   	u64 found_streams = 0;
>>   	unsigned int i;
>>   	int ret;
>> @@ -2198,6 +2199,8 @@ int v4l2_subdev_enable_streams(struct v4l2_subdev *sd, u32 pad,
>>   
>>   	dev_dbg(dev, "enable streams %u:%#llx\n", pad, streams_mask);
>>   
>> +	already_streaming = v4l2_subdev_is_streaming(sd);
>> +
>>   	/* Call the .enable_streams() operation. */
>>   	ret = v4l2_subdev_call(sd, pad, enable_streams, state, pad,
>>   			       streams_mask);
>> @@ -2216,6 +2219,9 @@ int v4l2_subdev_enable_streams(struct v4l2_subdev *sd, u32 pad,
>>   			cfg->enabled = true;
>>   	}
>>   
>> +	if (!already_streaming)
>> +		v4l2_subdev_enable_privacy_led(sd);
>> +
>>   done:
>>   	v4l2_subdev_unlock_state(state);
>>   
>> @@ -2340,6 +2346,9 @@ int v4l2_subdev_disable_streams(struct v4l2_subdev *sd, u32 pad,
>>   	}
>>   
>>   done:
>> +	if (!v4l2_subdev_is_streaming(sd))
> 
> Wouldn't it be more efficient to check this while looping over the
> stream configs in the loop just above ? Same for
> v4l2_subdev_enable_streams().

It would, but it would get a lot messier to manage with "media: subdev: 
Refactor v4l2_subdev_enable/disable_streams()", and we would also need 
to support the non-routing case.

This is usually a loop with a couple of iterations, and only called when 
enabling or enabling a subdevice, so I'm not really worried about the 
performance. If it's an issue, it would probably be better to also 
update the sd->enabled_pads when enabling/disabling a stream.

  Tomi
  
Laurent Pinchart April 19, 2024, 10:22 a.m. UTC | #4
On Tue, Apr 16, 2024 at 01:34:22PM +0300, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
> On 12/04/2024 21:20, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > Hi Tomi,
> > 
> > Thank you for the patch.
> > 
> > On Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 03:35:54PM +0300, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
> >> We support camera privacy leds with the .s_stream, in call_s_stream, but
> > 
> > s/the .s_stream/the .s_stream() operation/
> > 
> >> we don't have that support when the subdevice implements
> >> .enable/disable_streams.
> >>
> >> Add the support by enabling the led when the first stream for a
> >> subdevice is enabled, and disabling the led then the last stream is
> >> disabled.
> > 
> > I wonder if that will always be the correct constraint for all devices,
> > but I suppose we can worry about it later.
> > 
> >> Signed-off-by: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ideasonboard.com>
> >> ---
> >>   drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-subdev.c | 9 +++++++++
> >>   1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-subdev.c b/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-subdev.c
> >> index 20b5a00cbeeb..f44aaa4e1fab 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-subdev.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-subdev.c
> >> @@ -2150,6 +2150,7 @@ int v4l2_subdev_enable_streams(struct v4l2_subdev *sd, u32 pad,
> >>   {
> >>   	struct device *dev = sd->entity.graph_obj.mdev->dev;
> >>   	struct v4l2_subdev_state *state;
> >> +	bool already_streaming;
> >>   	u64 found_streams = 0;
> >>   	unsigned int i;
> >>   	int ret;
> >> @@ -2198,6 +2199,8 @@ int v4l2_subdev_enable_streams(struct v4l2_subdev *sd, u32 pad,
> >>   
> >>   	dev_dbg(dev, "enable streams %u:%#llx\n", pad, streams_mask);
> >>   
> >> +	already_streaming = v4l2_subdev_is_streaming(sd);
> >> +
> >>   	/* Call the .enable_streams() operation. */
> >>   	ret = v4l2_subdev_call(sd, pad, enable_streams, state, pad,
> >>   			       streams_mask);
> >> @@ -2216,6 +2219,9 @@ int v4l2_subdev_enable_streams(struct v4l2_subdev *sd, u32 pad,
> >>   			cfg->enabled = true;
> >>   	}
> >>   
> >> +	if (!already_streaming)
> >> +		v4l2_subdev_enable_privacy_led(sd);
> >> +
> >>   done:
> >>   	v4l2_subdev_unlock_state(state);
> >>   
> >> @@ -2340,6 +2346,9 @@ int v4l2_subdev_disable_streams(struct v4l2_subdev *sd, u32 pad,
> >>   	}
> >>   
> >>   done:
> >> +	if (!v4l2_subdev_is_streaming(sd))
> > 
> > Wouldn't it be more efficient to check this while looping over the
> > stream configs in the loop just above ? Same for
> > v4l2_subdev_enable_streams().
> 
> It would, but it would get a lot messier to manage with "media: subdev: 
> Refactor v4l2_subdev_enable/disable_streams()", and we would also need 
> to support the non-routing case.

True.

> This is usually a loop with a couple of iterations, and only called when 
> enabling or enabling a subdevice, so I'm not really worried about the 
> performance. If it's an issue, it would probably be better to also 
> update the sd->enabled_pads when enabling/disabling a stream.

OK, I can live with that for now.
  

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-subdev.c b/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-subdev.c
index 20b5a00cbeeb..f44aaa4e1fab 100644
--- a/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-subdev.c
+++ b/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-subdev.c
@@ -2150,6 +2150,7 @@  int v4l2_subdev_enable_streams(struct v4l2_subdev *sd, u32 pad,
 {
 	struct device *dev = sd->entity.graph_obj.mdev->dev;
 	struct v4l2_subdev_state *state;
+	bool already_streaming;
 	u64 found_streams = 0;
 	unsigned int i;
 	int ret;
@@ -2198,6 +2199,8 @@  int v4l2_subdev_enable_streams(struct v4l2_subdev *sd, u32 pad,
 
 	dev_dbg(dev, "enable streams %u:%#llx\n", pad, streams_mask);
 
+	already_streaming = v4l2_subdev_is_streaming(sd);
+
 	/* Call the .enable_streams() operation. */
 	ret = v4l2_subdev_call(sd, pad, enable_streams, state, pad,
 			       streams_mask);
@@ -2216,6 +2219,9 @@  int v4l2_subdev_enable_streams(struct v4l2_subdev *sd, u32 pad,
 			cfg->enabled = true;
 	}
 
+	if (!already_streaming)
+		v4l2_subdev_enable_privacy_led(sd);
+
 done:
 	v4l2_subdev_unlock_state(state);
 
@@ -2340,6 +2346,9 @@  int v4l2_subdev_disable_streams(struct v4l2_subdev *sd, u32 pad,
 	}
 
 done:
+	if (!v4l2_subdev_is_streaming(sd))
+		v4l2_subdev_disable_privacy_led(sd);
+
 	v4l2_subdev_unlock_state(state);
 
 	return ret;