[4/5] media: imx335: Fix active area height discrepency

Message ID 20240306081038.212412-5-umang.jain@ideasonboard.com (mailing list archive)
State Changes Requested
Headers
Series media: imx335: 2/4 lane ops and improvements |

Commit Message

Umang Jain March 6, 2024, 8:10 a.m. UTC
  The imx335 reports a recommended pixel area of - 2592x1944.
The driver supported mode however limits it to height=1940.

Fix the height discrepency by correctly the value of height
(with updates to vblank and mode registers).

Signed-off-by: Umang Jain <umang.jain@ideasonboard.com>
---
 drivers/media/i2c/imx335.c | 18 +++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
  

Comments

Kieran Bingham March 6, 2024, 5:05 p.m. UTC | #1
Quoting Umang Jain (2024-03-06 08:10:37)
> The imx335 reports a recommended pixel area of - 2592x1944.
> The driver supported mode however limits it to height=1940.

Hrm, I think I would convert widths and sizes to decimal as a patch
before this patch so the effect is clearer in this diff.

> Fix the height discrepency by correctly the value of height
> (with updates to vblank and mode registers).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Umang Jain <umang.jain@ideasonboard.com>
> ---
>  drivers/media/i2c/imx335.c | 18 +++++++++---------
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/media/i2c/imx335.c b/drivers/media/i2c/imx335.c
> index 6ea09933e47b..c00e0c2be3f3 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/i2c/imx335.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/i2c/imx335.c
> @@ -246,13 +246,13 @@ static const int imx335_tpg_val[] = {
>  };
>  
>  /* Sensor mode registers */
> -static const struct cci_reg_sequence mode_2592x1940_regs[] = {
> +static const struct cci_reg_sequence mode_2592x1944_regs[] = {
>         {IMX335_REG_MODE_SELECT, 0x01},
>         {IMX335_REG_MASTER_MODE, 0x00},
> -       {IMX335_REG_WINMODE, 0x04},
> -       {IMX335_REG_HTRIMMING_START, 0x0180},
> +       {IMX335_REG_WINMODE, 0x00},

What's the distinction of the winmode here. What is 0x04 vs 0x00?

Is this something that could be a defined value? Or is that not worth
the effort?

> +       {IMX335_REG_HTRIMMING_START, 0x30},

HTRIMMING_START has moved a lot more than I would expect there.
Is there a visual impact of any concern here?

>         {IMX335_REG_HNUM, 0x0a20},
> -       {IMX335_REG_Y_OUT_SIZE, 0x0794},
> +       {IMX335_REG_Y_OUT_SIZE, 0x0798},

This bit looks expected ;-)

>         {IMX335_REG_VCROP_POS, 0x00b0},
>         {IMX335_REG_VCROP_SIZE, 0x0f58},

0x0f58 = 3928. Does that correspond to anything on the pixel array size?
We're modifying the vertical size, so I'm curious if the 'vcrop' is or
should be impacted?

>         {IMX335_REG_OPB_SIZE_V, 0x00},
> @@ -403,14 +403,14 @@ static const u32 imx335_mbus_codes[] = {
>  /* Supported sensor mode configurations */
>  static const struct imx335_mode supported_mode = {
>         .width = 2592,
> -       .height = 1940,
> +       .height = 1944,
>         .hblank = 342,
> -       .vblank = 2560,
> -       .vblank_min = 2560,
> +       .vblank = 2556,
> +       .vblank_min = 2556,
>         .vblank_max = 133060,
>         .reg_list = {
> -               .num_of_regs = ARRAY_SIZE(mode_2592x1940_regs),
> -               .regs = mode_2592x1940_regs,
> +               .num_of_regs = ARRAY_SIZE(mode_2592x1944_regs),
> +               .regs = mode_2592x1944_regs,
>         },
>  };
>  
> -- 
> 2.43.0
>
  
Umang Jain March 6, 2024, 5:17 p.m. UTC | #2
Hi Kieran,

On 06/03/24 10:35 pm, Kieran Bingham wrote:
> Quoting Umang Jain (2024-03-06 08:10:37)
>> The imx335 reports a recommended pixel area of - 2592x1944.
>> The driver supported mode however limits it to height=1940.
> Hrm, I think I would convert widths and sizes to decimal as a patch
> before this patch so the effect is clearer in this diff.
>
>> Fix the height discrepency by correctly the value of height
>> (with updates to vblank and mode registers).
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Umang Jain <umang.jain@ideasonboard.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/media/i2c/imx335.c | 18 +++++++++---------
>>   1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/media/i2c/imx335.c b/drivers/media/i2c/imx335.c
>> index 6ea09933e47b..c00e0c2be3f3 100644
>> --- a/drivers/media/i2c/imx335.c
>> +++ b/drivers/media/i2c/imx335.c
>> @@ -246,13 +246,13 @@ static const int imx335_tpg_val[] = {
>>   };
>>   
>>   /* Sensor mode registers */
>> -static const struct cci_reg_sequence mode_2592x1940_regs[] = {
>> +static const struct cci_reg_sequence mode_2592x1944_regs[] = {
>>          {IMX335_REG_MODE_SELECT, 0x01},
>>          {IMX335_REG_MASTER_MODE, 0x00},
>> -       {IMX335_REG_WINMODE, 0x04},
>> -       {IMX335_REG_HTRIMMING_START, 0x0180},
>> +       {IMX335_REG_WINMODE, 0x00},
> What's the distinction of the winmode here. What is 0x04 vs 0x00?
>
> Is this something that could be a defined value? Or is that not worth
> the effort?

It can be split out as a define in later parts if we introduce more 
modes. currently this change fixes the sensor to be in 'all-pixel scan 
mode' hence you see the change in value of WINMODE.
>
>> +       {IMX335_REG_HTRIMMING_START, 0x30},
> HTRIMMING_START has moved a lot more than I would expect there.
> Is there a visual impact of any concern here?

Value as per mentioned in the datasheet
>
>>          {IMX335_REG_HNUM, 0x0a20},
>> -       {IMX335_REG_Y_OUT_SIZE, 0x0794},
>> +       {IMX335_REG_Y_OUT_SIZE, 0x0798},
> This bit looks expected ;-)
>
>>          {IMX335_REG_VCROP_POS, 0x00b0},
>>          {IMX335_REG_VCROP_SIZE, 0x0f58},
> 0x0f58 = 3928. Does that correspond to anything on the pixel array size?
> We're modifying the vertical size, so I'm curious if the 'vcrop' is or
> should be impacted?

Probably I have not named this correctly, as VCROP_

This register (0x3076) is denotes the size of cropping rectangle
Named as 'AREA3_WIDTH_1' with explaination 'cropping size designation 
(Vertical direction)'

The value 0x0f58 is as per mentioned in the datasheet. I don't find any 
relation except 3928 is twice the IMX335_NATIVE_HEIGHT
>
>>          {IMX335_REG_OPB_SIZE_V, 0x00},
>> @@ -403,14 +403,14 @@ static const u32 imx335_mbus_codes[] = {
>>   /* Supported sensor mode configurations */
>>   static const struct imx335_mode supported_mode = {
>>          .width = 2592,
>> -       .height = 1940,
>> +       .height = 1944,
>>          .hblank = 342,
>> -       .vblank = 2560,
>> -       .vblank_min = 2560,
>> +       .vblank = 2556,
>> +       .vblank_min = 2556,
>>          .vblank_max = 133060,
>>          .reg_list = {
>> -               .num_of_regs = ARRAY_SIZE(mode_2592x1940_regs),
>> -               .regs = mode_2592x1940_regs,
>> +               .num_of_regs = ARRAY_SIZE(mode_2592x1944_regs),
>> +               .regs = mode_2592x1944_regs,
>>          },
>>   };
>>   
>> -- 
>> 2.43.0
>>
  

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/media/i2c/imx335.c b/drivers/media/i2c/imx335.c
index 6ea09933e47b..c00e0c2be3f3 100644
--- a/drivers/media/i2c/imx335.c
+++ b/drivers/media/i2c/imx335.c
@@ -246,13 +246,13 @@  static const int imx335_tpg_val[] = {
 };
 
 /* Sensor mode registers */
-static const struct cci_reg_sequence mode_2592x1940_regs[] = {
+static const struct cci_reg_sequence mode_2592x1944_regs[] = {
 	{IMX335_REG_MODE_SELECT, 0x01},
 	{IMX335_REG_MASTER_MODE, 0x00},
-	{IMX335_REG_WINMODE, 0x04},
-	{IMX335_REG_HTRIMMING_START, 0x0180},
+	{IMX335_REG_WINMODE, 0x00},
+	{IMX335_REG_HTRIMMING_START, 0x30},
 	{IMX335_REG_HNUM, 0x0a20},
-	{IMX335_REG_Y_OUT_SIZE, 0x0794},
+	{IMX335_REG_Y_OUT_SIZE, 0x0798},
 	{IMX335_REG_VCROP_POS, 0x00b0},
 	{IMX335_REG_VCROP_SIZE, 0x0f58},
 	{IMX335_REG_OPB_SIZE_V, 0x00},
@@ -403,14 +403,14 @@  static const u32 imx335_mbus_codes[] = {
 /* Supported sensor mode configurations */
 static const struct imx335_mode supported_mode = {
 	.width = 2592,
-	.height = 1940,
+	.height = 1944,
 	.hblank = 342,
-	.vblank = 2560,
-	.vblank_min = 2560,
+	.vblank = 2556,
+	.vblank_min = 2556,
 	.vblank_max = 133060,
 	.reg_list = {
-		.num_of_regs = ARRAY_SIZE(mode_2592x1940_regs),
-		.regs = mode_2592x1940_regs,
+		.num_of_regs = ARRAY_SIZE(mode_2592x1944_regs),
+		.regs = mode_2592x1944_regs,
 	},
 };