diff mbox series

[v2,10/13] media: qcom: camss: Allow clocks vfeN vfe_liteN or vfe_lite

Message ID 20230817143812.677554-11-bryan.odonoghue@linaro.org (mailing list archive)
State Changes Requested
Delegated to: Hans Verkuil
Headers
Series media: qcom: camss: Add parameter passing to remove several outstanding bugs |

Commit Message

Bryan O'Donoghue Aug. 17, 2023, 2:38 p.m. UTC 
  The number of Video Front End - VFE or Image Front End - IFE supported
with new SoCs can vary both for the full and lite cases.

For example sdm845 has one vfe_lite and two vfe interfaces with the vfe
clock called simply "vfe_lite" with no integer postfix. sc8280xp has four
vfe and four vfe lite blocks.

We need to support the following clock name formats

- vfeN
- vfe_liteN
- vfe_lite

with N being any reasonably sized integer.

There are two sites in this code which need to do the same thing,
constructing and matching strings with the pattern above, so encapsulate
the logic in one function.

Signed-off-by: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@linaro.org>
---
 drivers/media/platform/qcom/camss/camss-vfe.c | 22 ++++++++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

Comments

Konrad Dybcio Aug. 18, 2023, 12:30 p.m. UTC | #1 
On 17.08.2023 16:38, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
> The number of Video Front End - VFE or Image Front End - IFE supported
> with new SoCs can vary both for the full and lite cases.
> 
> For example sdm845 has one vfe_lite and two vfe interfaces with the vfe
> clock called simply "vfe_lite" with no integer postfix. sc8280xp has four
> vfe and four vfe lite blocks.
> 
> We need to support the following clock name formats
> 
> - vfeN
> - vfe_liteN
> - vfe_lite
> 
> with N being any reasonably sized integer.
> 
> There are two sites in this code which need to do the same thing,
> constructing and matching strings with the pattern above, so encapsulate
> the logic in one function.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@linaro.org>
> ---
>  drivers/media/platform/qcom/camss/camss-vfe.c | 22 ++++++++++++++-----
>  1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/qcom/camss/camss-vfe.c b/drivers/media/platform/qcom/camss/camss-vfe.c
> index 8f48401e31cd3..73380e75dbb22 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/platform/qcom/camss/camss-vfe.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/qcom/camss/camss-vfe.c
> @@ -437,6 +437,20 @@ void vfe_isr_reset_ack(struct vfe_device *vfe)
>  	complete(&vfe->reset_complete);
>  }
>  
> +static int vfe_match_clock_names(struct vfe_device *vfe,
> +				 struct camss_clock *clock)
> +{
> +	char vfe_name[CAMSS_RES_MAX];
VFE_MAX?

the current value of 17 would be very excessive for VFEs!

Konrad
Bryan O'Donoghue Aug. 19, 2023, 2:49 p.m. UTC | #2 
On 18/08/2023 13:30, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> On 17.08.2023 16:38, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
>> The number of Video Front End - VFE or Image Front End - IFE supported
>> with new SoCs can vary both for the full and lite cases.
>>
>> For example sdm845 has one vfe_lite and two vfe interfaces with the vfe
>> clock called simply "vfe_lite" with no integer postfix. sc8280xp has four
>> vfe and four vfe lite blocks.
>>
>> We need to support the following clock name formats
>>
>> - vfeN
>> - vfe_liteN
>> - vfe_lite
>>
>> with N being any reasonably sized integer.
>>
>> There are two sites in this code which need to do the same thing,
>> constructing and matching strings with the pattern above, so encapsulate
>> the logic in one function.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@linaro.org>
>> ---
>>   drivers/media/platform/qcom/camss/camss-vfe.c | 22 ++++++++++++++-----
>>   1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/qcom/camss/camss-vfe.c b/drivers/media/platform/qcom/camss/camss-vfe.c
>> index 8f48401e31cd3..73380e75dbb22 100644
>> --- a/drivers/media/platform/qcom/camss/camss-vfe.c
>> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/qcom/camss/camss-vfe.c
>> @@ -437,6 +437,20 @@ void vfe_isr_reset_ack(struct vfe_device *vfe)
>>   	complete(&vfe->reset_complete);
>>   }
>>   
>> +static int vfe_match_clock_names(struct vfe_device *vfe,
>> +				 struct camss_clock *clock)
>> +{
>> +	char vfe_name[CAMSS_RES_MAX];
> VFE_MAX?
> 
> the current value of 17 would be very excessive for VFEs!
> 
> Konrad

Solving these generic and large struct resource strings is something I 
plan for another series.

Good enough ?

---
bod
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/qcom/camss/camss-vfe.c b/drivers/media/platform/qcom/camss/camss-vfe.c
index 8f48401e31cd3..73380e75dbb22 100644
--- a/drivers/media/platform/qcom/camss/camss-vfe.c
+++ b/drivers/media/platform/qcom/camss/camss-vfe.c
@@ -437,6 +437,20 @@  void vfe_isr_reset_ack(struct vfe_device *vfe)
 	complete(&vfe->reset_complete);
 }
 
+static int vfe_match_clock_names(struct vfe_device *vfe,
+				 struct camss_clock *clock)
+{
+	char vfe_name[CAMSS_RES_MAX];
+	char vfe_lite_name[CAMSS_RES_MAX];
+
+	snprintf(vfe_name, sizeof(vfe_name), "vfe%d", vfe->id);
+	snprintf(vfe_lite_name, sizeof(vfe_lite_name), "vfe_lite%d", vfe->id);
+
+	return (!strcmp(clock->name, vfe_name) ||
+		!strcmp(clock->name, vfe_lite_name) ||
+		!strcmp(clock->name, "vfe_lite"));
+}
+
 /*
  * vfe_set_clock_rates - Calculate and set clock rates on VFE module
  * @vfe: VFE device
@@ -460,9 +474,7 @@  static int vfe_set_clock_rates(struct vfe_device *vfe)
 	for (i = 0; i < vfe->nclocks; i++) {
 		struct camss_clock *clock = &vfe->clock[i];
 
-		if (!strcmp(clock->name, "vfe0") ||
-		    !strcmp(clock->name, "vfe1") ||
-		    !strcmp(clock->name, "vfe_lite")) {
+		if (vfe_match_clock_names(vfe, clock)) {
 			u64 min_rate = 0;
 			long rate;
 
@@ -543,9 +555,7 @@  static int vfe_check_clock_rates(struct vfe_device *vfe)
 	for (i = 0; i < vfe->nclocks; i++) {
 		struct camss_clock *clock = &vfe->clock[i];
 
-		if (!strcmp(clock->name, "vfe0") ||
-		    !strcmp(clock->name, "vfe1") ||
-		    !strcmp(clock->name, "vfe_lite")) {
+		if (vfe_match_clock_names(vfe, clock)) {
 			u64 min_rate = 0;
 			unsigned long rate;