[1/2] media: mt9m111: add device-tree suppport

  Add device-tree support for mt9m111 camera sensor.

Signed-off-by: Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@free.fr>
---
 drivers/media/i2c/soc_camera/mt9m111.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+)
  

Hi Robert,

Thanks for the patch.

On Sun, 15 Jun 2014, Robert Jarzmik wrote:

> Add device-tree support for mt9m111 camera sensor.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@free.fr>
> ---
>  drivers/media/i2c/soc_camera/mt9m111.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 21 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/media/i2c/soc_camera/mt9m111.c b/drivers/media/i2c/soc_camera/mt9m111.c
> index ccf5940..7d283ea 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/i2c/soc_camera/mt9m111.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/i2c/soc_camera/mt9m111.c
> @@ -923,6 +923,12 @@ done:
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
> +static int of_get_mt9m111_platform_data(struct device *dev,
> +					struct soc_camera_subdev_desc *desc)
> +{
> +	return 0;
> +}

Why do you need this function? I would just drop it.

> +
>  static int mt9m111_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
>  			 const struct i2c_device_id *did)
>  {
> @@ -931,6 +937,15 @@ static int mt9m111_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
>  	struct soc_camera_subdev_desc *ssdd = soc_camera_i2c_to_desc(client);
>  	int ret;
>  
> +	if (client->dev.of_node) {
> +		ssdd = devm_kzalloc(&client->dev, sizeof(*ssdd), GFP_KERNEL);
> +		if (!ssdd)
> +			return -ENOMEM;
> +		client->dev.platform_data = ssdd;
> +		ret = of_get_mt9m111_platform_data(&client->dev, ssdd);
> +		if (ret < 0)
> +			return ret;
> +	}
>  	if (!ssdd) {
>  		dev_err(&client->dev, "mt9m111: driver needs platform data\n");
>  		return -EINVAL;
> @@ -1015,6 +1030,11 @@ static int mt9m111_remove(struct i2c_client *client)
>  
>  	return 0;
>  }
> +static const struct of_device_id mt9m111_of_match[] = {
> +	{ .compatible = "micron,mt9m111", },

Not a flaw in this patch, but someone might want to add "micron" to 
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.txt

> +	{},
> +};
> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, mt9m111_of_match);
>  
>  static const struct i2c_device_id mt9m111_id[] = {
>  	{ "mt9m111", 0 },
> @@ -1025,6 +1045,7 @@ MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(i2c, mt9m111_id);
>  static struct i2c_driver mt9m111_i2c_driver = {
>  	.driver = {
>  		.name = "mt9m111",
> +		.of_match_table = of_match_ptr(mt9m111_of_match),
>  	},
>  	.probe		= mt9m111_probe,
>  	.remove		= mt9m111_remove,
> -- 
> 2.0.0.rc2
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
  

Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@gmx.de> writes:

> Hi Robert,
>> +static int of_get_mt9m111_platform_data(struct device *dev,
>> +					struct soc_camera_subdev_desc *desc)
>> +{
>> +	return 0;
>> +}
>
> Why do you need this function? I would just drop it.
Yeah, drop it sounds good. I wrote it at the beginning to have a clear
structure, and then didn't use it.


>> +static const struct of_device_id mt9m111_of_match[] = {
>> +	{ .compatible = "micron,mt9m111", },
>
> Not a flaw in this patch, but someone might want to add "micron" to 
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.txt
OK, I'll see what I can submit, it should be doable :)

Cheers.