Message ID | 20240603082614.1567712-1-wentong.wu@intel.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers |
Received: from sv.mirrors.kernel.org ([139.178.88.99]) by linuxtv.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from <linux-media+bounces-12430-patchwork=linuxtv.org@vger.kernel.org>) id 1sE2gj-0006Xv-1L for patchwork@linuxtv.org; Mon, 03 Jun 2024 08:05:06 +0000 Received: from smtp.subspace.kernel.org (wormhole.subspace.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by sv.mirrors.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D3ADE2816B4 for <patchwork@linuxtv.org>; Mon, 3 Jun 2024 08:05:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1198753365; Mon, 3 Jun 2024 08:04:58 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="gYkUeSH/" X-Original-To: linux-media@vger.kernel.org Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.7]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1CE51487BF for <linux-media@vger.kernel.org>; Mon, 3 Jun 2024 08:04:55 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.7 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1717401897; cv=none; b=SI1snebbwn6o+8pIt0+c7wtZTIRQLy99VOuGe2Fs3rclIKdMcyURcYFyOpoD1FQSMd3PW9toYp+6sSN9LVfECpPotMEC0ISt/5gG0B5Lvm4wwB3vHC/83XdUXqz5NO/o0xLTYmZd2UQIH86OdyyhM1ALCsLAhE4qjGf2iQxH/CM= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1717401897; c=relaxed/simple; bh=4hB5FsHCXAn5KIhRr2sF5rJyfS4jxlfgGQu1HsprWk8=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-Id:MIME-Version; b=PSfms0wFAYe9/Rdav1p9NxBWFTu08XxAhBEf7U19xpmkyQQALN/YAuvXIDiBB+jQ2m1DB9eiLRMXyYS0KQcPO1b+xME+JpHGxv0jBsnqnKEMboKxh4Ccm++Fd6mZ+zlTJFtH0po7FyeN7m6puw7oac5gqbXDD9x5t1IKvIy3LNI= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=gYkUeSH/; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.7 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1717401896; x=1748937896; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding; bh=4hB5FsHCXAn5KIhRr2sF5rJyfS4jxlfgGQu1HsprWk8=; b=gYkUeSH/QPTJTLGvNjPygW44+zHwW2Zqd3FJA0+mwiXPRYYjQx1djp2n LLqGlvJpzSmy6Zm1exEPM7uunqx3ERJnRwc4rBdOqs5fe8plfG7AsVyI+ yQ0fcylk298JB0CxOPfxZhhR7Os8QJ51zt+chlRb+/Amc3GufOoIcCGPL gcQ033E678fnw5wrao2Y4bJcQ6HZqR73bgqPIyyFZesO/4PITOgrH89V8 KDxFB7xeij9OCKcX6oj+Ah3r3EaC/sYe/Q8IYrcKgoBINoQjK7omx7BHC lmHwTxHKVxZnZqr3CHDcKwNsOvcqMfep6v8JMDFQ3rzwGZhUw8zCOf0dR A==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: QlXCRXqjSPW5auln+62BMg== X-CSE-MsgGUID: fT1aIYvfReGKB5lBeDe9hw== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,11091"; a="39285017" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.08,211,1712646000"; d="scan'208";a="39285017" Received: from orviesa010.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.150]) by fmvoesa101.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 03 Jun 2024 01:04:55 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: WcDWBTPNT0OcZQbdBLJvsQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: gZzQVTzCQCWrFI3+Yx2NtQ== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.08,211,1712646000"; d="scan'208";a="36721980" Received: from wentongw-optiplex-8070.sh.intel.com ([10.239.154.12]) by orviesa010.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 03 Jun 2024 01:04:55 -0700 From: Wentong Wu <wentong.wu@intel.com> To: sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com, linux-media@vger.kernel.org Cc: hao.yao@intel.com, Wentong Wu <wentong.wu@intel.com> Subject: [PATCH 0/3] Fix privacy issue for MEI CSI Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2024 16:26:11 +0800 Message-Id: <20240603082614.1567712-1-wentong.wu@intel.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.34.1 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-media@vger.kernel.org List-Id: <linux-media.vger.kernel.org> List-Subscribe: <mailto:linux-media+subscribe@vger.kernel.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:linux-media+unsubscribe@vger.kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-LSpam-Score: -5.9 (-----) X-LSpam-Report: No, score=-5.9 required=5.0 tests=ARC_SIGNED=0.001,ARC_VALID=-0.1,BAYES_00=-1.9,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-1,DKIM_SIGNED=0.1,DKIM_VALID=-0.1,DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1,DMARC_PASS=-0.001,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.5,MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3,SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001,SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no |
Series | Fix privacy issue for MEI CSI | |
Message
Wu, Wentong
June 3, 2024, 8:26 a.m. UTC
Currently if starting stream goes with privacy mode on, the whole pipeline will fail because MEI CSI counts privacy mode on as error. In face, the ongoing MEI command is well executed by firmware as well even if privacy mode is turned on. The status (-1) of command response is just to indicate current privacy on status instead of failed to execute command by firmware. This patch set changes the behavior to notify privacy mode on via v4l2 privacy control instead of fail the ongoing MEI command. This patch set adds one dedicated lock for v4l2 control handler to avoid dead locking issue as well. And the useless privacy status in struct mei_csi is removed to make code clean. Wentong Wu (3): media: ivsc: csi: don't count privacy on as error media: ivsc: csi: add separate lock for v4l2 control handler media: ivsc: csi: remove privacy status in struct mei_csi drivers/media/pci/intel/ivsc/mei_csi.c | 23 ++++++++++++++--------- 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)