Message ID | 20230803024645.2716057-1-ruanjinjie@huawei.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers |
Received: from vger.kernel.org ([23.128.96.18]) by www.linuxtv.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <linux-media-owner@vger.kernel.org>) id 1qRON8-009ALn-QB; Thu, 03 Aug 2023 02:47:31 +0000 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233677AbjHCCr2 (ORCPT <rfc822;mkrufky@linuxtv.org> + 1 other); Wed, 2 Aug 2023 22:47:28 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:34292 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233737AbjHCCr0 (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-media@vger.kernel.org>); Wed, 2 Aug 2023 22:47:26 -0400 Received: from szxga01-in.huawei.com (szxga01-in.huawei.com [45.249.212.187]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 50288272C; Wed, 2 Aug 2023 19:47:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from kwepemi500008.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.56]) by szxga01-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4RGY7x0lTwztRnt; Thu, 3 Aug 2023 10:43:57 +0800 (CST) Received: from huawei.com (10.90.53.73) by kwepemi500008.china.huawei.com (7.221.188.139) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2507.27; Thu, 3 Aug 2023 10:47:19 +0800 From: Ruan Jinjie <ruanjinjie@huawei.com> To: <sylvester.nawrocki@gmail.com>, <mchehab@kernel.org>, <ezequiel@vanguardiasur.com.ar>, <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>, <linux-media@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org> CC: <ruanjinjie@huawei.com> Subject: [PATCH -next 0/2] media: platform: Do not check for 0 return after calling platform_get_irq() Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2023 10:46:43 +0800 Message-ID: <20230803024645.2716057-1-ruanjinjie@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.34.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Originating-IP: [10.90.53.73] X-ClientProxiedBy: dggems701-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.178) To kwepemi500008.china.huawei.com (7.221.188.139) X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: <linux-media.vger.kernel.org> X-Mailing-List: linux-media@vger.kernel.org X-LSpam-Score: -2.4 (--) X-LSpam-Report: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00=-1.9,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.5,MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no |
Series |
media: platform: Do not check for 0 return after calling platform_get_irq()
|
|
Message
Jinjie Ruan
Aug. 3, 2023, 2:46 a.m. UTC
There is no possible for platform_get_irq() and platform_get_irq_byname() to return 0, And the return value of platform_get_irq() or platform_get_irq_byname() is more sensible to show the error reason. Ruan Jinjie (2): media: camif-core: Do not check for 0 return after calling platform_get_irq() media: verisilicon: Do not check for 0 return after calling platform_get_irq() drivers/media/platform/samsung/s3c-camif/camif-core.c | 4 ++-- drivers/media/platform/verisilicon/hantro_drv.c | 4 ++-- 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)