[2/2] staging/atomisp: putting NULs in the wrong place
Commit Message
We're putting the NUL terminators one space beyond where they belong.
This doesn't show up in testing because all but the callers put a NUL in
the correct place themselves. LOL. It causes a static checker warning
about buffer overflows.
Fixes: a49d25364dfb ("staging/atomisp: Add support for the Intel IPU v2")
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Comments
Am 15.05.2017 12:01, schrieb Dan Carpenter:
> We're putting the NUL terminators one space beyond where they belong.
> This doesn't show up in testing because all but the callers put a NUL in
> the correct place themselves. LOL. It causes a static checker warning
> about buffer overflows.
>
> Fixes: a49d25364dfb ("staging/atomisp: Add support for the Intel IPU v2")
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/pci/atomisp2/css2400/hive_isp_css_include/string_support.h b/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/pci/atomisp2/css2400/hive_isp_css_include/string_support.h
> index 74b5a1c7ac9a..c53241a7a281 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/pci/atomisp2/css2400/hive_isp_css_include/string_support.h
> +++ b/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/pci/atomisp2/css2400/hive_isp_css_include/string_support.h
> @@ -117,7 +117,7 @@ STORAGE_CLASS_INLINE int strncpy_s(
>
> /* dest_str is big enough for the len */
> strncpy(dest_str, src_str, len);
> - dest_str[len+1] = '\0';
> + dest_str[len] = '\0';
> return 0;
> }
>
> @@ -157,7 +157,7 @@ STORAGE_CLASS_INLINE int strcpy_s(
>
> /* dest_str is big enough for the len */
> strncpy(dest_str, src_str, len);
> - dest_str[len+1] = '\0';
> + dest_str[len] = '\0';
> return 0;
> }
>
can this strcpy_s() replaced with strlcpy ?
re,
wh
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 12:21:45PM +0200, walter harms wrote:
> can this strcpy_s() replaced with strlcpy ?
>
These functions obviously should be removed, yes. Please send a patch
for that and we can drop my patches. Give David reported-by credit.
regards,
dan carpenter
@@ -117,7 +117,7 @@ STORAGE_CLASS_INLINE int strncpy_s(
/* dest_str is big enough for the len */
strncpy(dest_str, src_str, len);
- dest_str[len+1] = '\0';
+ dest_str[len] = '\0';
return 0;
}
@@ -157,7 +157,7 @@ STORAGE_CLASS_INLINE int strcpy_s(
/* dest_str is big enough for the len */
strncpy(dest_str, src_str, len);
- dest_str[len+1] = '\0';
+ dest_str[len] = '\0';
return 0;
}