[v1,5/5] media: ir-spi: Unify indentation and comment style
Commit Message
Unify the indentation and multi-line comment style.
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
---
drivers/media/rc/ir-spi.c | 12 +++++-------
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
Comments
Hi Andy,
On Tue, Mar 05, 2024 at 07:48:30PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> Unify the indentation and multi-line comment style.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/media/rc/ir-spi.c | 12 +++++-------
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/media/rc/ir-spi.c b/drivers/media/rc/ir-spi.c
> index 801de3d108cc..8fc8e496e6aa 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/rc/ir-spi.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/rc/ir-spi.c
> @@ -36,8 +36,7 @@ struct ir_spi_data {
> struct regulator *regulator;
> };
>
> -static int ir_spi_tx(struct rc_dev *dev,
> - unsigned int *buffer, unsigned int count)
> +static int ir_spi_tx(struct rc_dev *dev, unsigned int *buffer, unsigned int count)
this goes over 80 characters, though. Not an error, but not worth
a change either.
I'm not going block the patch as the rest is OK.
Reviewed-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@kernel.org>
Andi
> {
> int i;
> int ret;
> @@ -57,7 +56,7 @@ static int ir_spi_tx(struct rc_dev *dev,
> return -EINVAL;
>
> /*
> - * the first value in buffer is a pulse, so that 0, 2, 4, ...
> + * The first value in buffer is a pulse, so that 0, 2, 4, ...
> * contain a pulse duration. On the contrary, 1, 3, 5, ...
> * contain a space duration.
> */
> @@ -146,9 +145,9 @@ static int ir_spi_probe(struct spi_device *spi)
> if (ret)
> dc = 50;
>
> - /* ir_spi_set_duty_cycle cannot fail,
> - * it returns int to be compatible with the
> - * rc->s_tx_duty_cycle function
> + /*
> + * ir_spi_set_duty_cycle() cannot fail, it returns int
> + * to be compatible with the rc->s_tx_duty_cycle function.
> */
> ir_spi_set_duty_cycle(idata->rc, dc);
>
> @@ -177,7 +176,6 @@ static struct spi_driver ir_spi_driver = {
> .of_match_table = ir_spi_of_match,
> },
> };
> -
> module_spi_driver(ir_spi_driver);
>
> MODULE_AUTHOR("Andi Shyti <andi@etezian.org>");
> --
> 2.43.0.rc1.1.gbec44491f096
>
On Tue, Mar 05, 2024 at 11:52:15PM +0100, Andi Shyti wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 05, 2024 at 07:48:30PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
...
> > +static int ir_spi_tx(struct rc_dev *dev, unsigned int *buffer, unsigned int count)
>
> this goes over 80 characters, though. Not an error, but not worth
> a change either.
It's only 82 characters and I consider this as an improvement in readability.
It's quite pity that some of the subsystems are too conservative, hope this
one is not an obstacle for them.
> I'm not going block the patch as the rest is OK.
>
> Reviewed-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@kernel.org>
Thank you!
Btw, don't you want to either add your entry into .mailcap and/or update your
email address in this source file (and maybe others)? I Cc'ed you only after
I looked closer to the sources...
On Wed, Mar 06, 2024 at 03:35:56PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 05, 2024 at 11:52:15PM +0100, Andi Shyti wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 05, 2024 at 07:48:30PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>
> ...
>
> > > +static int ir_spi_tx(struct rc_dev *dev, unsigned int *buffer, unsigned int count)
> >
> > this goes over 80 characters, though. Not an error, but not worth
> > a change either.
>
> It's only 82 characters and I consider this as an improvement in readability.
> It's quite pity that some of the subsystems are too conservative, hope this
> one is not an obstacle for them.
>
> > I'm not going block the patch as the rest is OK.
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@kernel.org>
>
> Thank you!
>
> Btw, don't you want to either add your entry into .mailcap and/or update your
> email address in this source file (and maybe others)? I Cc'ed you only after
> I looked closer to the sources...
yes, will do... I also noticed that lots of updates are missing...
I've been far from all this for too long, so that I have still
a lot of catch up to do :-)
Thanks, Andy!
Andi
@@ -36,8 +36,7 @@ struct ir_spi_data {
struct regulator *regulator;
};
-static int ir_spi_tx(struct rc_dev *dev,
- unsigned int *buffer, unsigned int count)
+static int ir_spi_tx(struct rc_dev *dev, unsigned int *buffer, unsigned int count)
{
int i;
int ret;
@@ -57,7 +56,7 @@ static int ir_spi_tx(struct rc_dev *dev,
return -EINVAL;
/*
- * the first value in buffer is a pulse, so that 0, 2, 4, ...
+ * The first value in buffer is a pulse, so that 0, 2, 4, ...
* contain a pulse duration. On the contrary, 1, 3, 5, ...
* contain a space duration.
*/
@@ -146,9 +145,9 @@ static int ir_spi_probe(struct spi_device *spi)
if (ret)
dc = 50;
- /* ir_spi_set_duty_cycle cannot fail,
- * it returns int to be compatible with the
- * rc->s_tx_duty_cycle function
+ /*
+ * ir_spi_set_duty_cycle() cannot fail, it returns int
+ * to be compatible with the rc->s_tx_duty_cycle function.
*/
ir_spi_set_duty_cycle(idata->rc, dc);
@@ -177,7 +176,6 @@ static struct spi_driver ir_spi_driver = {
.of_match_table = ir_spi_of_match,
},
};
-
module_spi_driver(ir_spi_driver);
MODULE_AUTHOR("Andi Shyti <andi@etezian.org>");