[v1,2/4] media: ipu3-cio2: Convert to use software_node_register_node_group()
Commit Message
The currently used software_node_register_nodes() is going to
be removed. Prepare driver by switchich to new API.
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
---
drivers/media/pci/intel/ipu3/cio2-bridge.c | 21 ++++++++++++++++++---
drivers/media/pci/intel/ipu3/cio2-bridge.h | 5 +++--
2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
Comments
Hi Andy
On 18/11/2022 18:56, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> The currently used software_node_register_nodes() is going to
> be removed. Prepare driver by switchich to new API.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
> ---
Also looks good to me:
Reviewed-by: Daniel Scally <dan.scally@ideasonboard.com>
> drivers/media/pci/intel/ipu3/cio2-bridge.c | 21 ++++++++++++++++++---
> drivers/media/pci/intel/ipu3/cio2-bridge.h | 5 +++--
> 2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/media/pci/intel/ipu3/cio2-bridge.c b/drivers/media/pci/intel/ipu3/cio2-bridge.c
> index 18974a72e94a..dfefe0d8aa95 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/pci/intel/ipu3/cio2-bridge.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/pci/intel/ipu3/cio2-bridge.c
> @@ -195,6 +195,19 @@ static void cio2_bridge_init_swnode_names(struct cio2_sensor *sensor)
> SWNODE_GRAPH_ENDPOINT_NAME_FMT, 0); /* And endpoint 0 */
> }
>
> +static void cio2_bridge_init_swnode_group(struct cio2_sensor *sensor)
> +{
> + struct software_node *nodes = sensor->swnodes;
> +
> + sensor->group[SWNODE_SENSOR_HID] = &nodes[SWNODE_SENSOR_HID];
> + sensor->group[SWNODE_SENSOR_PORT] = &nodes[SWNODE_SENSOR_PORT];
> + sensor->group[SWNODE_SENSOR_ENDPOINT] = &nodes[SWNODE_SENSOR_ENDPOINT];
> + sensor->group[SWNODE_CIO2_PORT] = &nodes[SWNODE_CIO2_PORT];
> + sensor->group[SWNODE_CIO2_ENDPOINT] = &nodes[SWNODE_CIO2_ENDPOINT];
> + if (sensor->ssdb.vcmtype)
> + sensor->group[SWNODE_VCM] = &nodes[SWNODE_VCM];
> +}
> +
> static void cio2_bridge_create_connection_swnodes(struct cio2_bridge *bridge,
> struct cio2_sensor *sensor)
> {
> @@ -219,6 +232,8 @@ static void cio2_bridge_create_connection_swnodes(struct cio2_bridge *bridge,
> if (sensor->ssdb.vcmtype)
> nodes[SWNODE_VCM] =
> NODE_VCM(cio2_vcm_types[sensor->ssdb.vcmtype - 1]);
> +
> + cio2_bridge_init_swnode_group(sensor);
> }
>
> static void cio2_bridge_instantiate_vcm_i2c_client(struct cio2_sensor *sensor)
> @@ -252,7 +267,7 @@ static void cio2_bridge_unregister_sensors(struct cio2_bridge *bridge)
>
> for (i = 0; i < bridge->n_sensors; i++) {
> sensor = &bridge->sensors[i];
> - software_node_unregister_nodes(sensor->swnodes);
> + software_node_unregister_node_group(sensor->group);
> ACPI_FREE(sensor->pld);
> acpi_dev_put(sensor->adev);
> i2c_unregister_device(sensor->vcm_i2c_client);
> @@ -310,7 +325,7 @@ static int cio2_bridge_connect_sensor(const struct cio2_sensor_config *cfg,
> cio2_bridge_create_fwnode_properties(sensor, bridge, cfg);
> cio2_bridge_create_connection_swnodes(bridge, sensor);
>
> - ret = software_node_register_nodes(sensor->swnodes);
> + ret = software_node_register_node_group(sensor->group);
> if (ret)
> goto err_free_pld;
>
> @@ -337,7 +352,7 @@ static int cio2_bridge_connect_sensor(const struct cio2_sensor_config *cfg,
> return 0;
>
> err_free_swnodes:
> - software_node_unregister_nodes(sensor->swnodes);
> + software_node_unregister_node_group(sensor->group);
> err_free_pld:
> ACPI_FREE(sensor->pld);
> err_put_adev:
> diff --git a/drivers/media/pci/intel/ipu3/cio2-bridge.h b/drivers/media/pci/intel/ipu3/cio2-bridge.h
> index 4418cbd08208..b93b749c65bd 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/pci/intel/ipu3/cio2-bridge.h
> +++ b/drivers/media/pci/intel/ipu3/cio2-bridge.h
> @@ -117,8 +117,9 @@ struct cio2_sensor {
> struct acpi_device *adev;
> struct i2c_client *vcm_i2c_client;
>
> - /* SWNODE_COUNT + 1 for terminating empty node */
> - struct software_node swnodes[SWNODE_COUNT + 1];
> + /* SWNODE_COUNT + 1 for terminating NULL */
> + const struct software_node *group[SWNODE_COUNT + 1];
> + struct software_node swnodes[SWNODE_COUNT];
> struct cio2_node_names node_names;
>
> struct cio2_sensor_ssdb ssdb;
Hi Dan,
On 11/21/22 11:19, Dan Scally wrote:
> Hi Andy
>
> On 18/11/2022 18:56, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>> The currently used software_node_register_nodes() is going to
>> be removed. Prepare driver by switchich to new API.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
>> ---
>
>
> Also looks good to me:
>
> Reviewed-by: Daniel Scally <dan.scally@ideasonboard.com>
Any chance you can also give this series a test run on an IPU3 device to
ensure that it does not cause regressions ?
Regards,
Hans
>
>> drivers/media/pci/intel/ipu3/cio2-bridge.c | 21 ++++++++++++++++++---
>> drivers/media/pci/intel/ipu3/cio2-bridge.h | 5 +++--
>> 2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/media/pci/intel/ipu3/cio2-bridge.c b/drivers/media/pci/intel/ipu3/cio2-bridge.c
>> index 18974a72e94a..dfefe0d8aa95 100644
>> --- a/drivers/media/pci/intel/ipu3/cio2-bridge.c
>> +++ b/drivers/media/pci/intel/ipu3/cio2-bridge.c
>> @@ -195,6 +195,19 @@ static void cio2_bridge_init_swnode_names(struct cio2_sensor *sensor)
>> SWNODE_GRAPH_ENDPOINT_NAME_FMT, 0); /* And endpoint 0 */
>> }
>> +static void cio2_bridge_init_swnode_group(struct cio2_sensor *sensor)
>> +{
>> + struct software_node *nodes = sensor->swnodes;
>> +
>> + sensor->group[SWNODE_SENSOR_HID] = &nodes[SWNODE_SENSOR_HID];
>> + sensor->group[SWNODE_SENSOR_PORT] = &nodes[SWNODE_SENSOR_PORT];
>> + sensor->group[SWNODE_SENSOR_ENDPOINT] = &nodes[SWNODE_SENSOR_ENDPOINT];
>> + sensor->group[SWNODE_CIO2_PORT] = &nodes[SWNODE_CIO2_PORT];
>> + sensor->group[SWNODE_CIO2_ENDPOINT] = &nodes[SWNODE_CIO2_ENDPOINT];
>> + if (sensor->ssdb.vcmtype)
>> + sensor->group[SWNODE_VCM] = &nodes[SWNODE_VCM];
>> +}
>> +
>> static void cio2_bridge_create_connection_swnodes(struct cio2_bridge *bridge,
>> struct cio2_sensor *sensor)
>> {
>> @@ -219,6 +232,8 @@ static void cio2_bridge_create_connection_swnodes(struct cio2_bridge *bridge,
>> if (sensor->ssdb.vcmtype)
>> nodes[SWNODE_VCM] =
>> NODE_VCM(cio2_vcm_types[sensor->ssdb.vcmtype - 1]);
>> +
>> + cio2_bridge_init_swnode_group(sensor);
>> }
>> static void cio2_bridge_instantiate_vcm_i2c_client(struct cio2_sensor *sensor)
>> @@ -252,7 +267,7 @@ static void cio2_bridge_unregister_sensors(struct cio2_bridge *bridge)
>> for (i = 0; i < bridge->n_sensors; i++) {
>> sensor = &bridge->sensors[i];
>> - software_node_unregister_nodes(sensor->swnodes);
>> + software_node_unregister_node_group(sensor->group);
>> ACPI_FREE(sensor->pld);
>> acpi_dev_put(sensor->adev);
>> i2c_unregister_device(sensor->vcm_i2c_client);
>> @@ -310,7 +325,7 @@ static int cio2_bridge_connect_sensor(const struct cio2_sensor_config *cfg,
>> cio2_bridge_create_fwnode_properties(sensor, bridge, cfg);
>> cio2_bridge_create_connection_swnodes(bridge, sensor);
>> - ret = software_node_register_nodes(sensor->swnodes);
>> + ret = software_node_register_node_group(sensor->group);
>> if (ret)
>> goto err_free_pld;
>> @@ -337,7 +352,7 @@ static int cio2_bridge_connect_sensor(const struct cio2_sensor_config *cfg,
>> return 0;
>> err_free_swnodes:
>> - software_node_unregister_nodes(sensor->swnodes);
>> + software_node_unregister_node_group(sensor->group);
>> err_free_pld:
>> ACPI_FREE(sensor->pld);
>> err_put_adev:
>> diff --git a/drivers/media/pci/intel/ipu3/cio2-bridge.h b/drivers/media/pci/intel/ipu3/cio2-bridge.h
>> index 4418cbd08208..b93b749c65bd 100644
>> --- a/drivers/media/pci/intel/ipu3/cio2-bridge.h
>> +++ b/drivers/media/pci/intel/ipu3/cio2-bridge.h
>> @@ -117,8 +117,9 @@ struct cio2_sensor {
>> struct acpi_device *adev;
>> struct i2c_client *vcm_i2c_client;
>> - /* SWNODE_COUNT + 1 for terminating empty node */
>> - struct software_node swnodes[SWNODE_COUNT + 1];
>> + /* SWNODE_COUNT + 1 for terminating NULL */
>> + const struct software_node *group[SWNODE_COUNT + 1];
>> + struct software_node swnodes[SWNODE_COUNT];
>> struct cio2_node_names node_names;
>> struct cio2_sensor_ssdb ssdb;
>
Morning
On 21/11/2022 10:22, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi Dan,
>
> On 11/21/22 11:19, Dan Scally wrote:
>> Hi Andy
>>
>> On 18/11/2022 18:56, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>>> The currently used software_node_register_nodes() is going to
>>> be removed. Prepare driver by switchich to new API.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
>>> ---
>>
>> Also looks good to me:
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Daniel Scally <dan.scally@ideasonboard.com>
> Any chance you can also give this series a test run on an IPU3 device to
> ensure that it does not cause regressions ?
Sure, wait please...
>
> Regards,
>
> Hans
>
>
>
>>> drivers/media/pci/intel/ipu3/cio2-bridge.c | 21 ++++++++++++++++++---
>>> drivers/media/pci/intel/ipu3/cio2-bridge.h | 5 +++--
>>> 2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/media/pci/intel/ipu3/cio2-bridge.c b/drivers/media/pci/intel/ipu3/cio2-bridge.c
>>> index 18974a72e94a..dfefe0d8aa95 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/media/pci/intel/ipu3/cio2-bridge.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/media/pci/intel/ipu3/cio2-bridge.c
>>> @@ -195,6 +195,19 @@ static void cio2_bridge_init_swnode_names(struct cio2_sensor *sensor)
>>> SWNODE_GRAPH_ENDPOINT_NAME_FMT, 0); /* And endpoint 0 */
>>> }
>>> +static void cio2_bridge_init_swnode_group(struct cio2_sensor *sensor)
>>> +{
>>> + struct software_node *nodes = sensor->swnodes;
>>> +
>>> + sensor->group[SWNODE_SENSOR_HID] = &nodes[SWNODE_SENSOR_HID];
>>> + sensor->group[SWNODE_SENSOR_PORT] = &nodes[SWNODE_SENSOR_PORT];
>>> + sensor->group[SWNODE_SENSOR_ENDPOINT] = &nodes[SWNODE_SENSOR_ENDPOINT];
>>> + sensor->group[SWNODE_CIO2_PORT] = &nodes[SWNODE_CIO2_PORT];
>>> + sensor->group[SWNODE_CIO2_ENDPOINT] = &nodes[SWNODE_CIO2_ENDPOINT];
>>> + if (sensor->ssdb.vcmtype)
>>> + sensor->group[SWNODE_VCM] = &nodes[SWNODE_VCM];
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> static void cio2_bridge_create_connection_swnodes(struct cio2_bridge *bridge,
>>> struct cio2_sensor *sensor)
>>> {
>>> @@ -219,6 +232,8 @@ static void cio2_bridge_create_connection_swnodes(struct cio2_bridge *bridge,
>>> if (sensor->ssdb.vcmtype)
>>> nodes[SWNODE_VCM] =
>>> NODE_VCM(cio2_vcm_types[sensor->ssdb.vcmtype - 1]);
>>> +
>>> + cio2_bridge_init_swnode_group(sensor);
>>> }
>>> static void cio2_bridge_instantiate_vcm_i2c_client(struct cio2_sensor *sensor)
>>> @@ -252,7 +267,7 @@ static void cio2_bridge_unregister_sensors(struct cio2_bridge *bridge)
>>> for (i = 0; i < bridge->n_sensors; i++) {
>>> sensor = &bridge->sensors[i];
>>> - software_node_unregister_nodes(sensor->swnodes);
>>> + software_node_unregister_node_group(sensor->group);
>>> ACPI_FREE(sensor->pld);
>>> acpi_dev_put(sensor->adev);
>>> i2c_unregister_device(sensor->vcm_i2c_client);
>>> @@ -310,7 +325,7 @@ static int cio2_bridge_connect_sensor(const struct cio2_sensor_config *cfg,
>>> cio2_bridge_create_fwnode_properties(sensor, bridge, cfg);
>>> cio2_bridge_create_connection_swnodes(bridge, sensor);
>>> - ret = software_node_register_nodes(sensor->swnodes);
>>> + ret = software_node_register_node_group(sensor->group);
>>> if (ret)
>>> goto err_free_pld;
>>> @@ -337,7 +352,7 @@ static int cio2_bridge_connect_sensor(const struct cio2_sensor_config *cfg,
>>> return 0;
>>> err_free_swnodes:
>>> - software_node_unregister_nodes(sensor->swnodes);
>>> + software_node_unregister_node_group(sensor->group);
>>> err_free_pld:
>>> ACPI_FREE(sensor->pld);
>>> err_put_adev:
>>> diff --git a/drivers/media/pci/intel/ipu3/cio2-bridge.h b/drivers/media/pci/intel/ipu3/cio2-bridge.h
>>> index 4418cbd08208..b93b749c65bd 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/media/pci/intel/ipu3/cio2-bridge.h
>>> +++ b/drivers/media/pci/intel/ipu3/cio2-bridge.h
>>> @@ -117,8 +117,9 @@ struct cio2_sensor {
>>> struct acpi_device *adev;
>>> struct i2c_client *vcm_i2c_client;
>>> - /* SWNODE_COUNT + 1 for terminating empty node */
>>> - struct software_node swnodes[SWNODE_COUNT + 1];
>>> + /* SWNODE_COUNT + 1 for terminating NULL */
>>> + const struct software_node *group[SWNODE_COUNT + 1];
>>> + struct software_node swnodes[SWNODE_COUNT];
>>> struct cio2_node_names node_names;
>>> struct cio2_sensor_ssdb ssdb;
On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 11:22:17AM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
> On 11/21/22 11:19, Dan Scally wrote:
> > On 18/11/2022 18:56, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> >> The currently used software_node_register_nodes() is going to
> >> be removed. Prepare driver by switchich to new API.
> > Also looks good to me:
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Daniel Scally <dan.scally@ideasonboard.com>
Thank you!
> Any chance you can also give this series a test run on an IPU3 device to
> ensure that it does not cause regressions ?
Yes, it would be really appreciated!
Hi Andy and Hans
On 21/11/2022 10:27, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 11:22:17AM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
>> On 11/21/22 11:19, Dan Scally wrote:
>>> On 18/11/2022 18:56, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>>>> The currently used software_node_register_nodes() is going to
>>>> be removed. Prepare driver by switchich to new API.
>>> Also looks good to me:
>>>
>>> Reviewed-by: Daniel Scally <dan.scally@ideasonboard.com>
> Thank you!
>
>> Any chance you can also give this series a test run on an IPU3 device to
>> ensure that it does not cause regressions ?
> Yes, it would be really appreciated!
All seems fine (including the kunit test) - you can add
Tested-by: Daniel Scally <dan.scally@ideasonboard.com>
to the series
Hi,
On 11/21/22 15:32, Dan Scally wrote:
> Hi Andy and Hans
>
> On 21/11/2022 10:27, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 11:22:17AM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
>>> On 11/21/22 11:19, Dan Scally wrote:
>>>> On 18/11/2022 18:56, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>>>>> The currently used software_node_register_nodes() is going to
>>>>> be removed. Prepare driver by switchich to new API.
>>>> Also looks good to me:
>>>>
>>>> Reviewed-by: Daniel Scally <dan.scally@ideasonboard.com>
>> Thank you!
>>
>>> Any chance you can also give this series a test run on an IPU3 device to
>>> ensure that it does not cause regressions ?
>> Yes, it would be really appreciated!
>
> All seems fine (including the kunit test) - you can add
>
>
> Tested-by: Daniel Scally <dan.scally@ideasonboard.com>
Great, thank you!
Regards,
Hans
@@ -195,6 +195,19 @@ static void cio2_bridge_init_swnode_names(struct cio2_sensor *sensor)
SWNODE_GRAPH_ENDPOINT_NAME_FMT, 0); /* And endpoint 0 */
}
+static void cio2_bridge_init_swnode_group(struct cio2_sensor *sensor)
+{
+ struct software_node *nodes = sensor->swnodes;
+
+ sensor->group[SWNODE_SENSOR_HID] = &nodes[SWNODE_SENSOR_HID];
+ sensor->group[SWNODE_SENSOR_PORT] = &nodes[SWNODE_SENSOR_PORT];
+ sensor->group[SWNODE_SENSOR_ENDPOINT] = &nodes[SWNODE_SENSOR_ENDPOINT];
+ sensor->group[SWNODE_CIO2_PORT] = &nodes[SWNODE_CIO2_PORT];
+ sensor->group[SWNODE_CIO2_ENDPOINT] = &nodes[SWNODE_CIO2_ENDPOINT];
+ if (sensor->ssdb.vcmtype)
+ sensor->group[SWNODE_VCM] = &nodes[SWNODE_VCM];
+}
+
static void cio2_bridge_create_connection_swnodes(struct cio2_bridge *bridge,
struct cio2_sensor *sensor)
{
@@ -219,6 +232,8 @@ static void cio2_bridge_create_connection_swnodes(struct cio2_bridge *bridge,
if (sensor->ssdb.vcmtype)
nodes[SWNODE_VCM] =
NODE_VCM(cio2_vcm_types[sensor->ssdb.vcmtype - 1]);
+
+ cio2_bridge_init_swnode_group(sensor);
}
static void cio2_bridge_instantiate_vcm_i2c_client(struct cio2_sensor *sensor)
@@ -252,7 +267,7 @@ static void cio2_bridge_unregister_sensors(struct cio2_bridge *bridge)
for (i = 0; i < bridge->n_sensors; i++) {
sensor = &bridge->sensors[i];
- software_node_unregister_nodes(sensor->swnodes);
+ software_node_unregister_node_group(sensor->group);
ACPI_FREE(sensor->pld);
acpi_dev_put(sensor->adev);
i2c_unregister_device(sensor->vcm_i2c_client);
@@ -310,7 +325,7 @@ static int cio2_bridge_connect_sensor(const struct cio2_sensor_config *cfg,
cio2_bridge_create_fwnode_properties(sensor, bridge, cfg);
cio2_bridge_create_connection_swnodes(bridge, sensor);
- ret = software_node_register_nodes(sensor->swnodes);
+ ret = software_node_register_node_group(sensor->group);
if (ret)
goto err_free_pld;
@@ -337,7 +352,7 @@ static int cio2_bridge_connect_sensor(const struct cio2_sensor_config *cfg,
return 0;
err_free_swnodes:
- software_node_unregister_nodes(sensor->swnodes);
+ software_node_unregister_node_group(sensor->group);
err_free_pld:
ACPI_FREE(sensor->pld);
err_put_adev:
@@ -117,8 +117,9 @@ struct cio2_sensor {
struct acpi_device *adev;
struct i2c_client *vcm_i2c_client;
- /* SWNODE_COUNT + 1 for terminating empty node */
- struct software_node swnodes[SWNODE_COUNT + 1];
+ /* SWNODE_COUNT + 1 for terminating NULL */
+ const struct software_node *group[SWNODE_COUNT + 1];
+ struct software_node swnodes[SWNODE_COUNT];
struct cio2_node_names node_names;
struct cio2_sensor_ssdb ssdb;