dma-buf: use wake_up_process() instead of wake_up_state()
Commit Message
Using wake_up_process() is more simpler and friendly,
and it is more convenient for analysis and statistics
Signed-off-by: Wang Qing <wangqing@vivo.com>
---
drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
Comments
Am 19.03.21 um 03:58 schrieb Wang Qing:
> Using wake_up_process() is more simpler and friendly,
> and it is more convenient for analysis and statistics
>
> Signed-off-by: Wang Qing <wangqing@vivo.com>
Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Should I pick it up or do you want to push it through some other tree
than DRM?
Thanks,
Christian.
> ---
> drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence.c b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence.c
> index 7475e09..de51326
> --- a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence.c
> @@ -655,7 +655,7 @@ dma_fence_default_wait_cb(struct dma_fence *fence, struct dma_fence_cb *cb)
> struct default_wait_cb *wait =
> container_of(cb, struct default_wait_cb, base);
>
> - wake_up_state(wait->task, TASK_NORMAL);
> + wake_up_process(wait->task);
> }
>
> /**
>> Using wake_up_process() is more simpler and friendly,
>> and it is more convenient for analysis and statistics
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Wang Qing <wangqing@vivo.com>
>
>Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
>
>Should I pick it up or do you want to push it through some other tree
>than DRM?
Pick it up just fine, thanks,
WangQing.
>
>Thanks,
>Christian.
@@ -655,7 +655,7 @@ dma_fence_default_wait_cb(struct dma_fence *fence, struct dma_fence_cb *cb)
struct default_wait_cb *wait =
container_of(cb, struct default_wait_cb, base);
- wake_up_state(wait->task, TASK_NORMAL);
+ wake_up_process(wait->task);
}
/**