[ANNOUNCE] DVB-S2 + H.264 support for VDR-1.5.12
Commit Message
Hi,
Reinhard Nissl schrieb:
> Well, I was in contact with Marco already and attached you'll
> find a minimalistic change which reports "channel not available".
> Now VDR should already be able to kick a low priority DVB-S
> recording (or transfer thread) from a DVB-S2 device.
The previous patch was wrong. Only DVB-S2 devices "could" provide
channels. The revised patch works now as expected.
> Still missing is to prefer DVB-S devices for DVB-S recordings so
> that DVB-S2 devices remain available for DVB-S2 recordings of
> same priority.
Still to do.
> The patch is incremental to the original dvbs2 patch from
> yesterday, i. e. you can simply apply it to your already patched VDR.
Bye.
@@ -798,7 +798,13 @@ bool cDvbDevice::ProvidesSource(int Sour
bool cDvbDevice::ProvidesTransponder(const cChannel *Channel) const
{
- return ProvidesSource(Channel->Source()) && (!cSource::IsSat(Channel->Source()) || !Setup.DiSEqC || Diseqcs.Get(Channel->Source(), Channel->Frequency(), Channel->Polarization()));
+ if (!ProvidesSource(Channel->Source()))
+ return false; // doesn't provide source
+ if (!cSource::IsSat(Channel->Source()))
+ return true; // source is sufficient for non sat
+ if (!(frontendType & Channel->ModulationSystem()))
+ return false; // requires modulation system which frontend doesn't provide
+ return !Setup.DiSEqC || Diseqcs.Get(Channel->Source(), Channel->Frequency(), Channel->Polarization());
}
bool cDvbDevice::ProvidesChannel(const cChannel *Channel, int Priority, bool *NeedsDetachReceivers) const
@@ -807,7 +813,7 @@ bool cDvbDevice::ProvidesChannel(const c
bool hasPriority = Priority < 0 || Priority > this->Priority();
bool needsDetachReceivers = false;
- if (ProvidesSource(Channel->Source())) {
+ if (ProvidesTransponder(Channel)) {
result = hasPriority;
if (Priority >= 0 && Receiving(true)) {
if (dvbTuner->IsTunedTo(Channel)) {