| Message ID | 200503212327.44462@orion.escape-edv.de |
|---|---|
| State | New |
| Headers |
Received: from pop.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20] helo=mail.gmx.net) by www.linuxtv.org with smtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DDVNz-0005kb-85 for vdr@linuxtv.org; Mon, 21 Mar 2005 23:28:35 +0100 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 21 Mar 2005 22:28:06 -0000 Received: from pD95F628A.dip.t-dialin.net (HELO cassiopeia.escape-edv.de) [217.95.98.138] by mail.gmx.net (mp014) with SMTP; 21 Mar 2005 23:28:06 +0100 X-Authenticated: #476490 Received: from orion (192.168.1.10) by cassiopeia.escape-edv.de (192.168.1.11) with esmtp ; Mon, 21 Mar 2005 23:33:39 +0100 From: Oliver Endriss <o.endriss@gmx.de> Organization: ESCAPE GmbH EDV-Loesungen To: vdr@linuxtv.org Subject: Re: [vdr] New Nexus FF Ver 2.3 cards Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2005 23:27:44 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 References: <GBEGLHDKLDFKDEFEDFOKOEBGCAAA.martin@kober.net> In-Reply-To: <GBEGLHDKLDFKDEFEDFOKOEBGCAAA.martin@kober.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: Multipart/Mixed; boundary="Boundary-00=_gp0PCz63fjfNcX3" Message-Id: <200503212327.44462@orion.escape-edv.de> X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-BeenThere: vdr@linuxtv.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: vdr@linuxtv.org List-Id: Klaus Schmidinger's VDR <vdr.linuxtv.org> List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr>, <mailto:vdr-request@linuxtv.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://www.linuxtv.org/pipermail/vdr> List-Post: <mailto:vdr@linuxtv.org> List-Help: <mailto:vdr-request@linuxtv.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr>, <mailto:vdr-request@linuxtv.org?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2005 22:28:35 -0000 Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 947 |
Commit Message
Oliver Endriss
March 21, 2005, 10:27 p.m. UTC
Martin Spears wrote: > without the use of diseqc the card does work. I can recieve from several > sats as long as I do not use diseqc switching. If I were to go direct then > everything works perfect. Ok, let's assume that the DiSEqC code in the stv0299 driver is buggy. Try the attached patch. Does it work now? If not, try to load the stv0299 driver with parameter 'debug=1' and post the output when tuning. Please post your diseqc.conf file. Oliver
Comments
here is my diseqc.conf # DiSEqC configuration for VDR # # Format: # # satellite slof polarization lof command... # # satellite: one of the 'S' codes defined in sources.conf # slof: switch frequency of LNB; the first entry with # an slof greater than the actual transponder # frequency will be used # polarization: V = vertical, H = horizontal # lof: the local oscillator frequency to subtract from # the actual transponder frequency # command: # t tone off # T tone on # v voltage low (13V) # V voltage high (18V) # A mini A # B mini B # Wnn wait nn milliseconds (nn may be any positive integer number) # [xx ...] hex code sequence (max. 6) # # The 'command...' part is optional. # # Examples: # Full DiSEqC sequence: S119W 11250 V 99999 t v W15 [E0 10 38 F0] W15 A W15 t S119W 99999 V 11250 t v W15 [E0 10 38 F1] W15 A W15 T S119W 11250 H 99999 t V W15 [E0 10 38 F2] W15 A W15 t S119W 99999 H 11250 t V W15 [E0 10 38 F3] W15 A W15 T S110W 11250 V 99999 t v W15 [E0 10 38 F4] W15 B W15 t S110W 99999 V 11250 t v W15 [E0 10 38 F5] W15 B W15 T S110W 11250 H 99999 t V W15 [E0 10 38 F6] W15 B W15 t S110W 99999 H 11250 t V W15 [E0 10 38 F7] W15 B W15 T and what happens when I cahnge channels softcam 0: setting new SID 118, source 84a6, transponder 33e06 softcam 0: logger stopped ecmcache: from cache: system Nagra (1800) id 0000 with ecm 24 softcam 0: try system Nagra (1800) id 0000 with ecm 24 (cached) (pri=-10) softcam 0: started logger sys=0x1800 id=0x0 system: using key N 101 00 B3E1DF3753758AB5 softcam 0: correct key found softcam 0: started logger sys=0x1800 id=0x0 softcam 0: check ProvidesCa: 1810 1801 1800 -> n=1 softcam 0: ignoring new SID 118, source 84a6, transponder 33e06 softcam 0: check ProvidesCa: 1810 1801 1800 -> n=1 softcam 0: setting new SID 506, source 844c, transponder 33e98 softcam 0: logger stopped ecmcache: from cache: system Nagra (1800) id 0000 with ecm 26 softcam 0: try system Nagra (1800) id 0000 with ecm 26 (cached) (pri=-10) softcam 0: started logger sys=0x1800 id=0x0 system: using key N 101 00 B3E1DF3753758AB5 softcam 0: correct key found softcam 0: started logger sys=0x1800 id=0x0 but when I change channels to this other sat, there is nothing but a blank screen. if I disconnect the switch and go direct then the system works perfect this happens with both vdr 1.3.22 and 1.3.23 any ideas -----Original Message----- From: vdr-bounces@linuxtv.org [mailto:vdr-bounces@linuxtv.org]On Behalf Of Oliver Endriss Sent: Monday, March 21, 2005 5:28 PM To: vdr@linuxtv.org Subject: Re: [vdr] New Nexus FF Ver 2.3 cards Martin Spears wrote: > without the use of diseqc the card does work. I can recieve from several > sats as long as I do not use diseqc switching. If I were to go direct then > everything works perfect. Ok, let's assume that the DiSEqC code in the stv0299 driver is buggy. Try the attached patch. Does it work now? If not, try to load the stv0299 driver with parameter 'debug=1' and post the output when tuning. Please post your diseqc.conf file. Oliver -- -------------------------------------------------------- VDR Remote Plugin available at http://www.escape-edv.de/endriss/vdr/ -------------------------------------------------------- -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.7.4 - Release Date: 3/18/2005 -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.8.0 - Release Date: 3/21/2005
Am 23.03.2005 um 20:24 schrieb Martin Spears: > softcam 0: correct key found > Ouch... You should try with a plain/vanilla VDR. Ciao
what is wrong with that. my problem is that the card will not switch through the diseqc. -----Original Message----- From: vdr-bounces@linuxtv.org [mailto:vdr-bounces@linuxtv.org]On Behalf Of Dominique Simon Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2005 4:23 PM To: Klaus Schmidinger's VDR Subject: Re: [vdr] New Nexus FF Ver 2.3 cards Am 23.03.2005 um 20:24 schrieb Martin Spears: > softcam 0: correct key found > Ouch... You should try with a plain/vanilla VDR. Ciao -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.8.0 - Release Date: 3/21/2005 -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.8.0 - Release Date: 3/21/2005
On Wednesday 23 March 2005 22:26, Martin Spears wrote: > what is wrong with that. my problem is that the card will not switch through > the diseqc. Support for this card has just been added to dvb-kernel cvs, so you should direct you inquiries there instead! This was already mentioned in this thread by Oliver Endriss, please follow what advise is given. Subscribing to the dvb-kernel mailing list can be done here: http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linux-dvb So there should be no more posts on this here, untill the diseqc stuff on the 2.3 revision of the nexus board is confirmed on the linux-dvb list. I added linux-dvb to CC list.. Kenneth
ok I subsrcibed to the mailing list -----Original Message----- From: vdr-bounces@linuxtv.org [mailto:vdr-bounces@linuxtv.org]On Behalf Of Kenneth Aafl?y Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2005 4:37 PM To: Klaus Schmidinger's VDR; linux-dvb@linuxtv.org Subject: [vdr] Diseqc on Nexus rev 2.3 (was: New Nexus FF Ver 2.3 cards) On Wednesday 23 March 2005 22:26, Martin Spears wrote: > what is wrong with that. my problem is that the card will not switch through > the diseqc. Support for this card has just been added to dvb-kernel cvs, so you should direct you inquiries there instead! This was already mentioned in this thread by Oliver Endriss, please follow what advise is given. Subscribing to the dvb-kernel mailing list can be done here: http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linux-dvb So there should be no more posts on this here, untill the diseqc stuff on the 2.3 revision of the nexus board is confirmed on the linux-dvb list. I added linux-dvb to CC list.. Kenneth
On Wednesday 23 March 2005 22:49, Martin Spears wrote: Kenneth Aafløy wrote: > > So there should be no more posts on this here, untill the diseqc > > stuff on the 2.3 revision of the nexus board is confirmed on the > > linux-dvb list. I added linux-dvb to CC list.. > > ok I subsrcibed to the mailing list You enjoyed that, ah? :) Another advise for those outlook users out there is to keep their eyes out for those quoting bugs that are present in every version of outlook. Kenneth
Am 23.03.2005 um 22:26 schrieb Martin Spears: > what is wrong with that. my problem is that the card will not switch > through > the diseqc. > Just do it. I experienced the weirdest things with plugins (VDR not tuning right to a channel for example), besides that, you posted softcam output with keys... Ciao
> S119W 11250 V 99999 t v W15 [E0 10 38 F0] W15 A W15 t > S119W 99999 V 11250 t v W15 [E0 10 38 F1] W15 A W15 T > S119W 11250 H 99999 t V W15 [E0 10 38 F2] W15 A W15 t > S119W 99999 H 11250 t V W15 [E0 10 38 F3] W15 A W15 T > > S110W 11250 V 99999 t v W15 [E0 10 38 F4] W15 B W15 t > S110W 99999 V 11250 t v W15 [E0 10 38 F5] W15 B W15 T > S110W 11250 H 99999 t V W15 [E0 10 38 F6] W15 B W15 t > S110W 99999 H 11250 t V W15 [E0 10 38 F7] W15 B W15 T I think your diseqc.conf is wrong, I am using Circular DBS LNB with 4X1 diseqc. it looks like this. Your values after the polarity (99999) I think is no good. #LNB1 S119W 99999 V 11250 t v W15 [E0 10 38 F0] S119W 99999 H 11250 t V W15 [E0 10 38 F0] #LNB2 S110W 99999 V 11250 t v W15 [E0 10 38 F4] S110W 99999 H 11250 t V W15 [E0 10 38 F4] # ^^^^^^^ LOF frequency, never seen 99999 #LNB3 = F8 #LNB4 = FC
Index: stv0299.c =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/linuxtv/dvb-kernel/linux/drivers/media/dvb/frontends/stv0299.c,v retrieving revision 1.65 diff -p -u -r1.65 stv0299.c --- stv0299.c 9 Mar 2005 15:52:00 -0000 1.65 +++ stv0299.c 21 Mar 2005 22:22:25 -0000 @@ -309,11 +309,19 @@ static int stv0299_send_diseqc_burst (st val = stv0299_readreg (state, 0x08); - if (stv0299_writeregI (state, 0x08, (val & ~0x7) | 0x2)) /* burst mode */ - return -EREMOTEIO; - - if (stv0299_writeregI (state, 0x09, burst == SEC_MINI_A ? 0x00 : 0xff)) - return -EREMOTEIO; + if (burst == SEC_MINI_A) { + /* unmodulated '0' tone burst */ + if (stv0299_writeregI (state, 0x08, (val & ~0x7) | 0x2)) + return -EREMOTEIO; + if (stv0299_writeregI (state, 0x09, 0x00)) + return -EREMOTEIO; + } else { + /* modulated '1' tone burst */ + if (stv0299_writeregI (state, 0x08, (val & ~0x7) | 0x6)) + return -EREMOTEIO; + if (stv0299_writeregI (state, 0x09, 0xff)) + return -EREMOTEIO; + } if (stv0299_wait_diseqc_idle (state, 100) < 0) return -ETIMEDOUT;