From patchwork Fri Dec 18 06:31:17 2020 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Nigel Christian X-Patchwork-Id: 70179 X-Patchwork-Delegate: hverkuil@xs4all.nl Received: from vger.kernel.org ([23.128.96.18]) by www.linuxtv.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kq9JO-008b0d-KO; Fri, 18 Dec 2020 06:32:23 +0000 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1732845AbgLRGcF (ORCPT + 1 other); Fri, 18 Dec 2020 01:32:05 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:43176 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1732830AbgLRGcF (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Dec 2020 01:32:05 -0500 Received: from mail-vk1-xa2c.google.com (mail-vk1-xa2c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::a2c]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BE315C0617A7; Thu, 17 Dec 2020 22:31:24 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-vk1-xa2c.google.com with SMTP id o195so277218vka.9; Thu, 17 Dec 2020 22:31:24 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:mime-version:content-disposition; bh=ObGsyMvKVeZhdZNtJYABaU0OlJzGDwB1XTw5HknW98w=; b=VFY3JDneellkJcK8fYUVTCjVjLvTQGFBTOpQ+FcvioJZaW8NGsgNGTsbcW3XB6Tt+S vdcJ1my23f1CCFk+cZORa89okkBo6WV6G37/jzi0Y/f+REpDi83m2yGN9LlovKCugbkk jXUbWgamW6lh8w5sozE2Ro+o9gpyTIMFHYIXGtwP2LRiv29gEQVUzhw/tAXZsdjEWFt4 JpZ2TUWUFxq050CXhu4+q3MXtFRUI0/94n665+rB+oJjwnGyjzMq5DmtHcXPsbjRiSKr vljtCtT6CM9GPs5riUa1+6abH1pEV46km5sKVxchSSiBERkJ8O9gCSaEOPvHy4gKdlLB LUkg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:mime-version :content-disposition; bh=ObGsyMvKVeZhdZNtJYABaU0OlJzGDwB1XTw5HknW98w=; b=TwjGW/Qd5UwiJ92vvFkM0dKTA3dgfwoMrj+nWsNqvZRnS+tTj19x/poejTiVgLjPiU DCiKY3Cv5BcXu0i/2bEdjL0rRX/hZAhbBBGgZVgH4PFK75SF5bQso+BUmcsdecZVNNgu kYojMArUjN20udHxZtMErO45bfmh70fq4irAtgbp4C/ol3NylXnioIFVqTb9dsCIWXus /0jqU2IR0XCSDeDFuf6ooVaOILnZAagtFruTLe517dkw0UrMjL6ICsgxefTDfY3axx6B xTso3GXvFGzxGBjf5IolIlhLj27D/YptIviUx4C6cJhcFl9rs3nuiwKfa4cGemOmM7Fx GTlA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5306tgLp/ia1sYrZIp2uJ6b0Q93gSCLoSgG3Zo0XO4nTi1nuXYR6 XdU3p4Mhwqz9QSuwcLmROic= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwusp5qfzxGF3xU1e4T41++sftUUha7hkzsv1ZJgAf6AII7ZhzXQxkfSjBbxWwnO+5U46Veig== X-Received: by 2002:a1f:9ed4:: with SMTP id h203mr2102352vke.1.1608273083917; Thu, 17 Dec 2020 22:31:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from fedora ([179.48.251.236]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id b19sm949757vsq.18.2020.12.17.22.31.20 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 17 Dec 2020 22:31:23 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2020 01:31:17 -0500 From: Nigel Christian To: hverkuil-cisco@xs4all.nl, mchehab@kernel.org, sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com, dan.carpenter@oracle.com, gustavoars@kernel.org Cc: linux-media@vger.kernel.org, trivial@kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH] media: cec: fix trivial style warnings Message-ID: <20201218063117.GA80700@fedora> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-media@vger.kernel.org X-LSpam-Score: -2.5 (--) X-LSpam-Report: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00=-1.9,DKIM_SIGNED=0.1,DKIM_VALID=-0.1,DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.001,FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.5,MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Comment has 'then' repeated twice. Let's clean it up. Use unsigned int to maintain naming consistency. Signed-off-by: Nigel Christian --- drivers/media/cec/core/cec-adap.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/media/cec/core/cec-adap.c b/drivers/media/cec/core/cec-adap.c index d5d5d28d0b36..79fa36de8a04 100644 --- a/drivers/media/cec/core/cec-adap.c +++ b/drivers/media/cec/core/cec-adap.c @@ -1296,7 +1296,7 @@ static int cec_config_log_addr(struct cec_adapter *adap, /* * If we are unable to get an OK or a NACK after max_retries attempts * (and note that each attempt already consists of four polls), then - * then we assume that something is really weird and that it is not a + * we assume that something is really weird and that it is not a * good idea to try and claim this logical address. */ if (i == max_retries) @@ -1735,7 +1735,7 @@ int __cec_s_log_addrs(struct cec_adapter *adap, const u8 feature_sz = ARRAY_SIZE(log_addrs->features[0]); u8 *features = log_addrs->features[i]; bool op_is_dev_features = false; - unsigned j; + unsigned int j; log_addrs->log_addr[i] = CEC_LOG_ADDR_INVALID; if (log_addrs->log_addr_type[i] > CEC_LOG_ADDR_TYPE_UNREGISTERED) {