From patchwork Fri Oct 23 12:21:40 2020 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Daniel Vetter X-Patchwork-Id: 68266 Received: from vger.kernel.org ([23.128.96.18]) by www.linuxtv.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kVvzF-00Dq70-DF; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 12:16:02 +0000 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2900850AbgJWMW5 (ORCPT + 1 other); Fri, 23 Oct 2020 08:22:57 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:37982 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S463639AbgJWMW4 (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Oct 2020 08:22:56 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-x442.google.com (mail-wr1-x442.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::442]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 53A31C0613CE for ; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 05:22:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wr1-x442.google.com with SMTP id g12so1562730wrp.10 for ; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 05:22:56 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ffwll.ch; s=google; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=13dXuBKsrPtV1DlWwyiIYqTF1cPCadFdp8ckLAWd0AI=; b=ZLQYcJfGXFA882t746W/3+RPIsXyZnhi4SwDIyg6MTBPgmo0ug4tuTNhsmPDGRsV1R om7kV/lJ7tQL8I335IWN4eoYkgJc5G62sDYmr2kL5A/r0tu/lpbPN15e0H+jst1xf+hU NWlcqaPiMhTfjeLoSXdopaVX6OqVUgSNKKf3k= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=13dXuBKsrPtV1DlWwyiIYqTF1cPCadFdp8ckLAWd0AI=; b=Eeg8WeUMxEj5EpU48cKmfFC1rJsR+gKfjhANmDmEzk8QAeF6j7Xa8DliowzKnwq4C7 XVmF7V2uYQL/hxEaRiF2VkOICCOqzA/+PSGPBsm5cxS41Zuv4cu7d00NRRf70GJ6nj9d VlF3QUYgEbXeoEYXRC6Auh+wtcskTL+NZnKFBR3k/gptgR3CEhE+xRizAbp3jzbg3dkh wJ//zWv1C6Mtnl1++0SbHYThWyWHsjwijYyKH4MP1zNf3P3qOjZT92AKeLt6vV3rv0gE Zq5g2GILZycfW2t2VfUJTM848x9jzOCvse1Bi5zgceDdvDsRjKjW2W/M/P+WLW4RoCNc TGTg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530wUcGK5zhkJ8kOhbCaK1n8RTA/+WKiXfk/ugARc/08dg4TB2Mp 8qAglBkSo9eFsfxUsZTIIOqWEQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyqSAn0aM35YnoVtNUbn1vJJ8l+XxiU6chHGaoO67vyxZzJbEVkyOyc9YZmKmVc8U3bDNN/Yw== X-Received: by 2002:adf:e685:: with SMTP id r5mr2560251wrm.340.1603455774974; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 05:22:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from phenom.ffwll.local ([2a02:168:57f4:0:efd0:b9e5:5ae6:c2fa]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id y4sm3056484wrp.74.2020.10.23.05.22.53 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 23 Oct 2020 05:22:54 -0700 (PDT) From: Daniel Vetter To: DRI Development Cc: Intel Graphics Development , Daniel Vetter , Gerald Schaefer , Daniel Vetter , Jason Gunthorpe , Dan Williams , Kees Cook , Andrew Morton , John Hubbard , =?utf-8?b?SsOpcsO0bWUgR2xpc3Nl?= , Jan Kara , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org, Niklas Schnelle , linux-s390@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH 29/65] s390/pci: Remove races against pte updates Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2020 14:21:40 +0200 Message-Id: <20201023122216.2373294-29-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.28.0 In-Reply-To: <20201023122216.2373294-1-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> References: <20201021163242.1458885-1-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> <20201023122216.2373294-1-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> MIME-Version: 1.0 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-media@vger.kernel.org X-LSpam-Score: -2.5 (--) X-LSpam-Report: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00=-1.9,DKIM_SIGNED=0.1,DKIM_VALID=-0.1,DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.5,MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Way back it was a reasonable assumptions that iomem mappings never change the pfn range they point at. But this has changed: - gpu drivers dynamically manage their memory nowadays, invalidating ptes with unmap_mapping_range when buffers get moved - contiguous dma allocations have moved from dedicated carvetouts to cma regions. This means if we miss the unmap the pfn might contain pagecache or anon memory (well anything allocated with GFP_MOVEABLE) - even /dev/mem now invalidates mappings when the kernel requests that iomem region when CONFIG_IO_STRICT_DEVMEM is set, see commit 3234ac664a87 ("/dev/mem: Revoke mappings when a driver claims the region") Accessing pfns obtained from ptes without holding all the locks is therefore no longer a good idea. Fix this. Since zpci_memcpy_from|toio seems to not do anything nefarious with locks we just need to open code get_pfn and follow_pfn and make sure we drop the locks only after we're done. The write function also needs the copy_from_user move, since we can't take userspace faults while holding the mmap sem. v2: Move VM_IO | VM_PFNMAP checks around so they keep returning EINVAL like before (Gerard) v3: Polish commit message (Niklas) Reviewed-by: Gerald Schaefer Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter Cc: Jason Gunthorpe Cc: Dan Williams Cc: Kees Cook Cc: Andrew Morton Cc: John Hubbard Cc: Jérôme Glisse Cc: Jan Kara Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Cc: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-media@vger.kernel.org Cc: Niklas Schnelle Cc: Gerald Schaefer Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org Cc: Niklas Schnelle Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter --- arch/s390/pci/pci_mmio.c | 98 +++++++++++++++++++++++----------------- 1 file changed, 57 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/s390/pci/pci_mmio.c b/arch/s390/pci/pci_mmio.c index 401cf670a243..1a6adbc68ee8 100644 --- a/arch/s390/pci/pci_mmio.c +++ b/arch/s390/pci/pci_mmio.c @@ -119,33 +119,15 @@ static inline int __memcpy_toio_inuser(void __iomem *dst, return rc; } -static long get_pfn(unsigned long user_addr, unsigned long access, - unsigned long *pfn) -{ - struct vm_area_struct *vma; - long ret; - - mmap_read_lock(current->mm); - ret = -EINVAL; - vma = find_vma(current->mm, user_addr); - if (!vma) - goto out; - ret = -EACCES; - if (!(vma->vm_flags & access)) - goto out; - ret = follow_pfn(vma, user_addr, pfn); -out: - mmap_read_unlock(current->mm); - return ret; -} - SYSCALL_DEFINE3(s390_pci_mmio_write, unsigned long, mmio_addr, const void __user *, user_buffer, size_t, length) { u8 local_buf[64]; void __iomem *io_addr; void *buf; - unsigned long pfn; + struct vm_area_struct *vma; + pte_t *ptep; + spinlock_t *ptl; long ret; if (!zpci_is_enabled()) @@ -158,7 +140,7 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE3(s390_pci_mmio_write, unsigned long, mmio_addr, * We only support write access to MIO capable devices if we are on * a MIO enabled system. Otherwise we would have to check for every * address if it is a special ZPCI_ADDR and would have to do - * a get_pfn() which we don't need for MIO capable devices. Currently + * a pfn lookup which we don't need for MIO capable devices. Currently * ISM devices are the only devices without MIO support and there is no * known need for accessing these from userspace. */ @@ -176,21 +158,37 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE3(s390_pci_mmio_write, unsigned long, mmio_addr, } else buf = local_buf; - ret = get_pfn(mmio_addr, VM_WRITE, &pfn); + ret = -EFAULT; + if (copy_from_user(buf, user_buffer, length)) + goto out_free; + + mmap_read_lock(current->mm); + ret = -EINVAL; + vma = find_vma(current->mm, mmio_addr); + if (!vma) + goto out_unlock_mmap; + if (!(vma->vm_flags & (VM_IO | VM_PFNMAP))) + goto out_unlock_mmap; + ret = -EACCES; + if (!(vma->vm_flags & VM_WRITE)) + goto out_unlock_mmap; + + ret = follow_pte_pmd(vma->vm_mm, mmio_addr, NULL, &ptep, NULL, &ptl); if (ret) - goto out; - io_addr = (void __iomem *)((pfn << PAGE_SHIFT) | + goto out_unlock_mmap; + + io_addr = (void __iomem *)((pte_pfn(*ptep) << PAGE_SHIFT) | (mmio_addr & ~PAGE_MASK)); - ret = -EFAULT; if ((unsigned long) io_addr < ZPCI_IOMAP_ADDR_BASE) - goto out; - - if (copy_from_user(buf, user_buffer, length)) - goto out; + goto out_unlock_pt; ret = zpci_memcpy_toio(io_addr, buf, length); -out: +out_unlock_pt: + pte_unmap_unlock(ptep, ptl); +out_unlock_mmap: + mmap_read_unlock(current->mm); +out_free: if (buf != local_buf) kfree(buf); return ret; @@ -274,7 +272,9 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE3(s390_pci_mmio_read, unsigned long, mmio_addr, u8 local_buf[64]; void __iomem *io_addr; void *buf; - unsigned long pfn; + struct vm_area_struct *vma; + pte_t *ptep; + spinlock_t *ptl; long ret; if (!zpci_is_enabled()) @@ -287,7 +287,7 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE3(s390_pci_mmio_read, unsigned long, mmio_addr, * We only support read access to MIO capable devices if we are on * a MIO enabled system. Otherwise we would have to check for every * address if it is a special ZPCI_ADDR and would have to do - * a get_pfn() which we don't need for MIO capable devices. Currently + * a pfn lookup which we don't need for MIO capable devices. Currently * ISM devices are the only devices without MIO support and there is no * known need for accessing these from userspace. */ @@ -306,22 +306,38 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE3(s390_pci_mmio_read, unsigned long, mmio_addr, buf = local_buf; } - ret = get_pfn(mmio_addr, VM_READ, &pfn); + mmap_read_lock(current->mm); + ret = -EINVAL; + vma = find_vma(current->mm, mmio_addr); + if (!vma) + goto out_unlock_mmap; + if (!(vma->vm_flags & (VM_IO | VM_PFNMAP))) + goto out_unlock_mmap; + ret = -EACCES; + if (!(vma->vm_flags & VM_WRITE)) + goto out_unlock_mmap; + + ret = follow_pte_pmd(vma->vm_mm, mmio_addr, NULL, &ptep, NULL, &ptl); if (ret) - goto out; - io_addr = (void __iomem *)((pfn << PAGE_SHIFT) | (mmio_addr & ~PAGE_MASK)); + goto out_unlock_mmap; + + io_addr = (void __iomem *)((pte_pfn(*ptep) << PAGE_SHIFT) | + (mmio_addr & ~PAGE_MASK)); if ((unsigned long) io_addr < ZPCI_IOMAP_ADDR_BASE) { ret = -EFAULT; - goto out; + goto out_unlock_pt; } ret = zpci_memcpy_fromio(buf, io_addr, length); - if (ret) - goto out; - if (copy_to_user(user_buffer, buf, length)) + +out_unlock_pt: + pte_unmap_unlock(ptep, ptl); +out_unlock_mmap: + mmap_read_unlock(current->mm); + + if (!ret && copy_to_user(user_buffer, buf, length)) ret = -EFAULT; -out: if (buf != local_buf) kfree(buf); return ret;