From patchwork Mon Jun 14 20:26:41 2010 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: "Justin P. Mattock" X-Patchwork-Id: 3652 Return-path: Envelope-to: mchehab@infradead.org Delivery-date: Mon, 14 Jun 2010 20:29:25 +0000 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org [18.85.46.34] by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-6.3.17) for (single-drop); Tue, 15 Jun 2010 07:59:48 +0300 (EEST) Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1OOGHd-00053T-7H; Mon, 14 Jun 2010 20:29:25 +0000 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755693Ab0FNU0w (ORCPT + 1 other); Mon, 14 Jun 2010 16:26:52 -0400 Received: from mail-pw0-f46.google.com ([209.85.160.46]:43718 "EHLO mail-pw0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755366Ab0FNU0u (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Jun 2010 16:26:50 -0400 Received: by mail-pw0-f46.google.com with SMTP id 1so3012616pwi.19 for ; Mon, 14 Jun 2010 13:26:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:x-mailer:in-reply-to:references; bh=HMXLuamrXI1adG4GDeXP6bT7bzi6SQGbNYxpRKoH8eY=; b=N6C/XRw6sMFDPVk8dNqR6IjW8JFHUTgszOLTaW7N+EVVR1+Zwo9HcUhQz+cPeHT9Nt 2m152lATnIs/h7JYXgfTFxl2nbt9pYCV7Ppuguwek22tUbCELKpPW/jcKUL74FfMiA+V w6d7c1r1/zPCAKPeH5iiczoi54BMmm9ryDcP0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:x-mailer:in-reply-to:references; b=TfAAwmb5L2tlxzexKd3S87YSz1WlFBHOq/m1zyawNrmfqZPLOcvgt71IFGZWWiP+UE 8p98Jz+bbzlEh2TwNi13Nz1h5HQxgn1gG2YNWzcelbfT0aN3JTiaKO1AfoWURf9EMGY0 iRqVj3yk914spBVJP44xUlX6OEbY1A2kxHmgM= Received: by 10.114.186.17 with SMTP id j17mr4916400waf.108.1276547208283; Mon, 14 Jun 2010 13:26:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([76.91.45.220]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id r20sm58982854wam.5.2010.06.14.13.26.46 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 14 Jun 2010 13:26:47 -0700 (PDT) From: "Justin P. Mattock" To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: reiserfs-devel@vger.kernel.org, linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org, clemens@ladisch.de, debora@linux.vnet.ibm.com, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux1394-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-media@vger.kernel.org, "Justin P. Mattock" Subject: [PATCH 1/8]reiserfs:stree.c Fix variable set but not used. Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2010 13:26:41 -0700 Message-Id: <1276547208-26569-2-git-send-email-justinmattock@gmail.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.7.1.rc1.21.gf3bd6 In-Reply-To: <1276547208-26569-1-git-send-email-justinmattock@gmail.com> References: <1276547208-26569-1-git-send-email-justinmattock@gmail.com> Sender: linux-media-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-media@vger.kernel.org Not sure if this is correct or not. the below patch gets rid of this warning message produced by gcc 4.6.0 fs/reiserfs/stree.c: In function 'search_by_key': fs/reiserfs/stree.c:602:6: warning: variable 'right_neighbor_of_leaf_node' set but not used Signed-off-by: Justin P. Mattock Acked-by: Edward Shishkin --- fs/reiserfs/stree.c | 7 ++----- 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/reiserfs/stree.c b/fs/reiserfs/stree.c index 313d39d..73086ad 100644 --- a/fs/reiserfs/stree.c +++ b/fs/reiserfs/stree.c @@ -599,7 +599,6 @@ int search_by_key(struct super_block *sb, const struct cpu_key *key, /* Key to s struct buffer_head *bh; struct path_element *last_element; int node_level, retval; - int right_neighbor_of_leaf_node; int fs_gen; struct buffer_head *reada_bh[SEARCH_BY_KEY_READA]; b_blocknr_t reada_blocks[SEARCH_BY_KEY_READA]; @@ -617,8 +616,7 @@ int search_by_key(struct super_block *sb, const struct cpu_key *key, /* Key to s pathrelse(search_path); - right_neighbor_of_leaf_node = 0; - + /* With each iteration of this loop we search through the items in the current node, and calculate the next current node(next path element) for the next iteration of this loop.. */ @@ -695,8 +693,7 @@ int search_by_key(struct super_block *sb, const struct cpu_key *key, /* Key to s starting from the root. */ block_number = SB_ROOT_BLOCK(sb); expected_level = -1; - right_neighbor_of_leaf_node = 0; - + /* repeat search from the root */ continue; }