[for,4.7] v4l2-ioctl: fix stupid mistake in cropcap condition
Commit Message
Fix duplicate tests in condition. The second test for vidioc_cropcap
should have tested for vidioc_g_selection instead.
Signed-off-by: Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@cisco.com>
Reported-by: David Binderman <linuxdev.baldrick@gmail.com>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Comments
On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 01:45:44PM +0200, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> Fix duplicate tests in condition. The second test for vidioc_cropcap
> should have tested for vidioc_g_selection instead.
>
> Signed-off-by: Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@cisco.com>
> Reported-by: David Binderman <linuxdev.baldrick@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>
@@ -2171,7 +2171,7 @@ static int v4l_cropcap(const struct v4l2_ioctl_ops *ops,
* The determine_valid_ioctls() call already should ensure
* that this can never happen, but just in case...
*/
- if (WARN_ON(!ops->vidioc_cropcap && !ops->vidioc_cropcap))
+ if (WARN_ON(!ops->vidioc_cropcap && !ops->vidioc_g_selection))
return -ENOTTY;
if (ops->vidioc_cropcap)