Message ID | 1393832008-22174-6-git-send-email-archit@ti.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Changes Requested, archived |
Delegated to: | Kamil Debski |
Headers |
Received: from mail.tu-berlin.de ([130.149.7.33]) by www.linuxtv.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <linux-media-owner@vger.kernel.org>) id 1WKNOV-0004sE-JF; Mon, 03 Mar 2014 08:34:35 +0100 X-tubIT-Incoming-IP: 209.132.180.67 Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by mail.tu-berlin.de (exim-4.72/mailfrontend-6) with esmtp id 1WKNOS-0002aw-6O; Mon, 03 Mar 2014 08:34:35 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753918AbaCCHe3 (ORCPT <rfc822;mkrufky@linuxtv.org> + 1 other); Mon, 3 Mar 2014 02:34:29 -0500 Received: from devils.ext.ti.com ([198.47.26.153]:41323 "EHLO devils.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752339AbaCCHe2 (ORCPT <rfc822; linux-media@vger.kernel.org>); Mon, 3 Mar 2014 02:34:28 -0500 Received: from dflxv15.itg.ti.com ([128.247.5.124]) by devils.ext.ti.com (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id s237YOUp018675; Mon, 3 Mar 2014 01:34:24 -0600 Received: from DLEE71.ent.ti.com (dlee71.ent.ti.com [157.170.170.114]) by dflxv15.itg.ti.com (8.14.3/8.13.8) with ESMTP id s237YOdj004074; Mon, 3 Mar 2014 01:34:24 -0600 Received: from dlep32.itg.ti.com (157.170.170.100) by DLEE71.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.114) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.174.1; Mon, 3 Mar 2014 01:34:23 -0600 Received: from legion.dal.design.ti.com (legion.dal.design.ti.com [128.247.22.53]) by dlep32.itg.ti.com (8.14.3/8.13.8) with ESMTP id s237YNnd012840; Mon, 3 Mar 2014 01:34:23 -0600 Received: from localhost (a0393947pc.apr.dhcp.ti.com [172.24.145.166] (may be forged)) by legion.dal.design.ti.com (8.11.7p1+Sun/8.11.7) with ESMTP id s237YLt10965; Mon, 3 Mar 2014 01:34:21 -0600 (CST) From: Archit Taneja <archit@ti.com> To: <k.debski@samsung.com> CC: <linux-media@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>, <hverkuil@xs4all.nl>, <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>, Archit Taneja <archit@ti.com> Subject: [PATCH 5/7] v4l: ti-vpe: Allow usage of smaller images Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2014 13:03:26 +0530 Message-ID: <1393832008-22174-6-git-send-email-archit@ti.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.8.3.2 In-Reply-To: <1393832008-22174-1-git-send-email-archit@ti.com> References: <1393832008-22174-1-git-send-email-archit@ti.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sender: linux-media-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: <linux-media.vger.kernel.org> X-Mailing-List: linux-media@vger.kernel.org X-PMX-Version: 6.0.0.2142326, Antispam-Engine: 2.7.2.2107409, Antispam-Data: 2014.3.3.72715 X-PMX-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIIII, Probability=9%, Report=' MULTIPLE_RCPTS 0.1, HTML_00_01 0.05, HTML_00_10 0.05, MSGID_ADDED_BY_MTA 0.05, BODYTEXTP_SIZE_3000_LESS 0, BODY_SIZE_1100_1199 0, BODY_SIZE_2000_LESS 0, BODY_SIZE_5000_LESS 0, BODY_SIZE_7000_LESS 0, URI_ENDS_IN_HTML 0, __ANY_URI 0, __CP_MEDIA_BODY 0, __CP_URI_IN_BODY 0, __CT 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __HAS_FROM 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __HAS_X_MAILER 0, __HAS_X_MAILING_LIST 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __MULTIPLE_RCPTS_CC_X2 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __SUBJ_ALPHA_END 0, __SXL_SIG_ERROR_SERVFAIL , __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __TO_NO_NAME 0, __URI_NO_WWW 0, __URI_NS ' |
Commit Message
Archit Taneja
March 3, 2014, 7:33 a.m. UTC
The minimum width and height for VPE input/output was kept as 128 pixels. VPE
doesn't have a constraint on the image height, it requires the image width to
be atleast 16 bytes.
Change the minimum supported dimensions to 32x32. This allows us to de-interlace
qcif content. A smaller image size than 32x32 didn't make much sense, so stopped
at this.
Signed-off-by: Archit Taneja <archit@ti.com>
---
drivers/media/platform/ti-vpe/vpe.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Comments
Hi Archit, > From: Archit Taneja [mailto:archit@ti.com] > Sent: Monday, March 03, 2014 8:33 AM > > The minimum width and height for VPE input/output was kept as 128 > pixels. VPE doesn't have a constraint on the image height, it requires > the image width to be atleast 16 bytes. "16 bytes" - shouldn't it be pixels? (also "at least" :) ) I can correct it when applying the patch if the above is the case. > Change the minimum supported dimensions to 32x32. This allows us to de- > interlace qcif content. A smaller image size than 32x32 didn't make > much sense, so stopped at this. > > Signed-off-by: Archit Taneja <archit@ti.com> Best wishes,
Hi, On Monday 03 March 2014 05:44 PM, Kamil Debski wrote: > Hi Archit, > >> From: Archit Taneja [mailto:archit@ti.com] >> Sent: Monday, March 03, 2014 8:33 AM >> >> The minimum width and height for VPE input/output was kept as 128 >> pixels. VPE doesn't have a constraint on the image height, it requires >> the image width to be atleast 16 bytes. > > "16 bytes" - shouldn't it be pixels? (also "at least" :) ) > I can correct it when applying the patch if the above is the case. VPDMA IP requires the line stride of the input/output images to be at least 16 bytes in total. This can safely result in a minimum width of 16 pixels(NV12 has the least bpp with 1 byte per pixel). But we don't really have any need to support such small image resolutions. So I picked up 32x32 as the minimum size, and tested VPE with that. Thanks, Archit -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/ti-vpe/vpe.c b/drivers/media/platform/ti-vpe/vpe.c index 915029b..3a610a6 100644 --- a/drivers/media/platform/ti-vpe/vpe.c +++ b/drivers/media/platform/ti-vpe/vpe.c @@ -49,8 +49,8 @@ #define VPE_MODULE_NAME "vpe" /* minimum and maximum frame sizes */ -#define MIN_W 128 -#define MIN_H 128 +#define MIN_W 32 +#define MIN_H 32 #define MAX_W 1920 #define MAX_H 1080